wolfking wrote:So this is pretty much all pointing towards Ted not playing by the looks.
Yeah mate as we all expected he won't be playing. He's probs sweet but since we have Melbourne next Thursday why risk it aye?
NRL Fantasy Fanatics - A place for discussion of NRL Fantasy / Virtual Sports / Super Coach and other Fantasy Sports
wolfking wrote:So this is pretty much all pointing towards Ted not playing by the looks.
WT2K wrote:Hughes back for storm
Pookus McFly wrote:
But are you going as a Broncos fan or as a newly minted Titans fan?
Revraiser wrote:
Christ, LS may very well be one of us, right amongst it !
WT Winfield wrote:
Pap averaging 38.5 with him and 35 without this season. Nice
I think ruck rules will be too technical for league players to pick them up easily. Would need to be more league style.robelgordo wrote:
Could a RL team just park a few players back (like wingers dropping back late in the set) and trust their remaining 10 or so players to defend? Not commit to rucks (if there's rucks) and just back their defense to number up and wait for errors?
Means kicks from inside the 22 would be hard to defend, but otherwise could work.
Will happily admit not an expert on union, just think a hybrid game would remove any technical/forward advantage through necessity and speculating that an emphasis on athleticism and workrate favours the version of rugby where the forwards more closely resemble backs.
WT2K wrote:
Feeling a 40 for pap this week
KingTeddy wrote:
Yeah mate as we all expected he won't be playing. He's probs sweet but since we have Melbourne next Thursday why risk it aye?
As a non-owner, happy for him to get 39-40 every week. Prices him around $513k value this season.wolfking wrote:
Probably a 39 just to rub it in.
wolfking wrote:So this is pretty much all pointing towards Ted not playing by the looks.
Juggernauts wrote:With Teddy out, which who would you buy out of Mitchell or Nofo? Already have both Teddy and Ponga
Chewie wrote:
As a non-Teddy owner this would be a good thing
wolfking wrote:
You not trading him are you?
Chewie wrote:
As a non-Teddy owner this would be a good thing
Exactly what I expected to happen so no surprise.wolfking wrote:So this is pretty much all pointing towards Ted not playing by the looks.
Rabbits21 wrote:
Exactly what I expected to happen so no surprise.