NRL Fantasy Fanatics - A place for discussion of NRL Fantasy / Virtual Sports / Super Coach and other Fantasy Sports
Welshy wrote:
Fuck me dead. 66 point ceiling average, each to their own mate.
Flanno was also kicking goals. +8 points. For top 2 side in comp. Can't cherry pick
my tv broke wrote:
Pretty much this. The top tier halves kick the shit out of the ball every week and usually kick goals too.
Fogs biggest fan here but he will be hard pressed to elevate to elite level half. 55avg is probably his ceiling imo (forum bet anyone?)
Everyone expects titans to do well but that still remains to be seen. They arent the storm or the roosters, it wont surprise me if they take a month or two to get going, they arent just gonna turn up and blow teams off the park from round 1
mattnz wrote:
Good point, Fogarty was also kicking goals in that period, an average of 2 points per game that Brown doesn't do. Makes his ceiling even higher at around 68.
Its welshy's methodology, I am just applying it.my tv broke wrote:Fogartys ceiling is 68 because of Dylan Brown? Might be time for bed lol, that justification is cooked
mattnz wrote:
Its welshy's methodology, I am just applying it.
In all seriousness though, I do think 57 is a realistic target average for Fogarty this season.
my tv broke wrote:Fogartys ceiling is 68 because of Dylan Brown? Might be time for bed lol, that justification is cooked
mattnz wrote:Likely starting and bench mids minutes for sharks last season:
Tolman 60
Woods 52
McInnes 79
Fifita 33 (down from 51+ every other year)
Hamlin Uele 43
Rudolf 46
Total minutes last season - 313
Minutes available - 240
Significantly over-subscribed
My expected minutes would have to be something like:
Tolman 50
Woods 45
McInnes 60
Fifita 30
Hamlin Uele 30
Rudolf 25
Wouldn't surprise to see a rotation policy through the season either, giving guys like Williams, Talakai and Hunt game time as well, a bit like the Raiders do. Pele was also being heavily talked up by Morris in pre-season.
Dragons needed him to play 80, even when they had Hunt at hooker. Mary was saying that he wanted guys like Kerr playing for high impact minutes, not long minutes.Mearcats wrote:
Would you honestly give two old guys more minutes than Rudolf and Hamlin Uele who were far more effective than them last year? I just can't see it. Actually, if you completely reversed those names on that list and left the numbers as they are that'd make a lot more sense. I also don't think you chase McInnes to play him for 60mins though am happy to say they may do just that.
Ever heard of the second year syndrome?mattnz wrote:
Its welshy's methodology, I am just applying it.
In all seriousness though, I do think 57 is a realistic target average for Fogarty this season. How many rookies don't improve in their 2nd season?
my tv broke wrote:That Lolo news is interesting and probably rules him out of contention for me, although id still bet he plays closer to 60 mins than 50 mins on avg.
I had actually wondered whether they would use him at 2nd row ala harris to ease his load a bit but i guess not.
It does leave me interested in the hooker, assuming it is Robson. Youve got 6 interchanges on the three starting middles, and im not sure both edges are going to play 80??
Rabbits21 wrote:Wow that took off quickly the last 90mins or so. I’ve just caught up on the 3-4 pages.
Is anyone thinking of starting without McInnes or Cleary? Would be a brave move....... Actually just remembered I think MS was considering it..... you’d be starting without them if you think they’re gonna drop cash and lose 80-100k....
Just thinking of a Moses and Munster halves combo that’d be pretty strong actually. I may just need to make a draft up like this and see how it looks....
I’m assuming those that don’t start with McInnes or Cleary will captain Cook.
my tv broke wrote:That Lolo news is interesting and probably rules him out of contention for me, although id still bet he plays closer to 60 mins than 50 mins on avg.
I had actually wondered whether they would use him at 2nd row ala harris to ease his load a bit but i guess not.
It does leave me interested in the hooker, assuming it is Robson. Youve got 6 interchanges on the three starting middles, and im not sure both edges are going to play 80??
Welshy wrote:
Mentioned Robson and had in side weeks ago but only based on his 80 minute games where his average skyrockets
but in real life he was poor playing the huge minutes and better suited to a fully sparked 60/65
my tv broke wrote:
Cotter was really good at the end of season too. Id be surprised if they plan for Robson to play 80 but if that is going to be the case, well hard to ignore
Home