Big Nick wrote:
Out of that lot it's Whitehead by a street - he's not entirely risk-free but if he adapts to the NRL and plays 80 he could push for gun status, whereas the other 3 have no hope of doing that.
thanks again Big Nick.
NRL Fantasy Fanatics - A place for discussion of NRL Fantasy / Virtual Sports / Super Coach and other Fantasy Sports
Big Nick wrote:
Out of that lot it's Whitehead by a street - he's not entirely risk-free but if he adapts to the NRL and plays 80 he could push for gun status, whereas the other 3 have no hope of doing that.
Archer wrote:Ok, I'll throw up my team, why not.
Smith, JNiko
Surgess, Vaughan, Grant, Evans
Parker, Whitehead, Rochow, Ah Mau, Jedwards, Leuluai
SJohnson, JRey, Hastings, Taylor
BJ, Green, Benry, Gutherson
Mansour, Barba, Mann, Feeney, Mitchell
Done, Phuck it if you don't take risks its no fun*
*I'll likely change my mind again but that's the mentality for this hour
prize piggies wrote:thanks superbucks, any suggestions for a replacement 2RF for hoffman that comes in under 321k? i'd like to steer clear of Mateo as he can be rocks or diamonds. so im thinking its out of isaac lui, Chris McQueen, Will Matthews or Elliot Whitehead. (leaning towards whitey)
superbucks wrote:SI wrote:
Yes, this is more what I am going for. The cash is there for the 1st 2 or 3 rounds to correct mistakes. So hoping I am not too far behind by then. So a lot of us for example are going in with only 1 gun in the halves. I will have the cash to upgrade the other 1 or 2 to guns if they fail. Others are going in with a rookie hooker. If I did that (I'm not) I would have the cash to correct that risk.
Not saying it will work and acknowledge it will more than likely not work, but after 9 years of playing this game conservatively I need to think outside the box.
Yep that's one of the benefits you will have with a large bankroll. It's one of the things I believe isn't well explored with the current price changing in fantasy, that is price changes immediately. It is generally accepted that starting with a low amount of cash in the bank ensures you have as many points on ground as possible. But that line of thinking really comes from the old game, where you had 2 rounds of corrections free of price changes. Now if a player under-performs (role or standards of play aren't up to preseason projections) or a player gets an LTI in-game you will lose cash on this player immediately, and you might not be able to replace like-with-like and you certainly couldn't upgrade. Not saying everyone should consider leaving money in the bank, just not sure if the old way of thinking is as absolute for the current game. And also we need a bit of luck.
I think even if it doesn't work this year it could work in another year. This year with the interchanges reducing you might be able to swoop on some who are getting jumps in tog. The conservative v aggressive approach is something that's always been a contentious topic in fantasy and is mostly subjective. Good luck with your team, I'm sure your results will be interesting and watched by anyone who's serious about fantasy.
Good on you mate, I hope it works!SI wrote:
I have against my better judgement and the majority of advice from the forum decided to run with it. Over the last decade I have always been an extremely conservative player up till last year. The next month will be the tell.
If they are going to be in your 17 you need to pick the one that will score the most. Work out who you think that will be and grab them.Showbags wrote:Hey guys, I got one spot left in my team and I cant for the life of me decide on who
I am deciding between 3 players, Rochow, Grant, Turner.
Rochow I just don't see the money, averaging 40 he will make $50k
Grant averaging 35-40 makes $30-75k
Turner averaging 40 makes $100k
Based off that I would lean towards turner, but given the Gurgess coming back next week, how likely will a 40pt average be when he slots out of 13 into 11? (if not the bench)
Coathanger wrote:Show's you how hard this is..Both my mentors tell me to sack Oates he's no good
Oh well hope the rest of my team can fire up.
Good luck everyone.
Oz Sport Mad wrote:This is what I'm running with lads:
Seggy, Hodgson
Woods, Matulino, Evans, Leuluai
Surgess, , Cartright, Merrin, Whitehead, McQueen, Safiti
DCE, Hastings, Taylor, JNiko
LBrown, Benry, Gutherson, Green
Mansour, Barba, Feeney, Mitchell, Copley
Thoughts and suggestions?
Finch wrote:No idea what to do...
Smith. J Niko
Graham. Bromwich. Evans. D Saifiti
Surgess. Taupau, Parker. Carter, Rochow. J. Saifiti
DCE. Hastings. C. Walker. Taylor
Hunt. Gutherson. Green. Henry
Inglis. Gordon. Mitchell. Barba. Eden.
Only $3K in the bank. Want to trade Evans out. With only $3K there is no wriggle room. The only options I can see is Evans - Matu'utai (Via Surgess to FRF, then Green to 2RF,). Other than that nobody NEEDS to be traded right now, but there are better cows out there, and Evans is pretty stale.
ryno_ wrote:
Which Bromwich? If its Jesse you could go to JTurbo and free up extra coin to help the Evans trade to someone like Mataora, Korbin or Paasi.
That'd be crazy. I'd be tempted to hold and go early on the next minimum price cow who you think is a chance at a few games.Finch wrote:
Its Jeese yeah. Im not trading him out lol.
Finch wrote:
Its Jeese yeah. Im not trading him out lol.