NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 46 - Couldn't be effed during the game.

Revraiser wrote:



Makes me remember that time I think Ricky said in the media when he was coaching the Sharks that they were not using the whole cap and he got told to rescind or reword his comments.

So many players get overs, and contracts that are to long. A massive issue for me that almost never gets spoken about. The top players even say get a 3 or 4 year deal based on there current form, so often leads to the 3rd or 4th year being way overs as they play like Muppets once the money is locked down.

Revraiser wrote:

This guy is a prime example. Has put no gusto into his every run for years.

multiple.scoregasms wrote:These little over payments add up and is why teams like Tigers, Bulldogs, Warriors and Souths stay in the cellar for so long

multiple.scoregasms wrote:

Problem is bad teams paying overs to get fringe rep players on similar salaries to actual rep player. Luke Brooks is on similar coin to DCE without justifying it with performance. DWZ apparently on 850k while someone like To'o or Tupou would be on 250k cheaper. These little over payments add up and is why teams like Tigers, Bulldogs, Warriors and Souths stay in the cellar for so long

B/L wrote:Duno what is with all the referring issues tonight on here , in the commentary box and on social media. Seems a lot of people don't know the rules of the game.

my tv broke wrote:

multiple.scoregasms wrote:

Should be paid like a poor man's Tolman instead of a rep quality forward. Players like Woods and Tolman have a place in first grade but that place shouldn't be in your top 10 highest paid players

Revraiser wrote:

Boom, yeah exactly. And I know it's not easy, as clubs have to make choices with what's in front of them and swiftly. It's just rampant and doesn't look like stopping. Bad teams more exposed to it as they have to take what they can more often than not. DWZ is a great example, seriously how was that coin ever speculated let alone put on paper.

Revraiser wrote:

Boom, yeah exactly. And I know it's not easy, as clubs have to make choices with what's in front of them and swiftly. It's just rampant and doesn't look like stopping. Bad teams more exposed to it as they have to take what they can more often than not. DWZ is a great example, seriously how was that coin ever speculated let alone put on paper.

multiple.scoregasms wrote:

multiple.scoregasms wrote:

Problem is bad teams paying overs to get fringe rep players on similar salaries to actual rep player. Luke Brooks is on similar coin to DCE without justifying it with performance. DWZ apparently on 850k while someone like To'o or Tupou would be on 250k cheaper. These little over payments add up and is why teams like Tigers, Bulldogs, Warriors and Souths stay in the cellar for so long

ynot wrote:Starling is a sell right?

Seems he will only get 50 - 60 minutes for around 44 points.

Priced at a little more than that, will likely lose cash over the next few weeks and probably isn't even top 5 at his position going forward?

Liverpool_Bulldog wrote:

Will be selling after the bye

Ramitinmyhaaas wrote:Ooft. Just saw via Adam Elliots instagram he posted a story last night about Papalii's 250th game and Elliot said "can't wait to run out with ya brother"...