Finch wrote:
But then wouldn't of Haas got more?
He should have got more.
NRL Fantasy Fanatics - A place for discussion of NRL Fantasy / Virtual Sports / Super Coach and other Fantasy Sports
Finch wrote:
But then wouldn't of Haas got more?
Yeah I think the laziness and the fact that he had to create the momentum to bring him down. Just a shit play really from a player in a team getting pumpedmickspicks wrote:
That's a fair point. It's hard to distinguish. I am happy with the Nanai one because he was beat and then lazy, so made the active choice to swing around. Just overall lazy imo and that's the shit that needs to be cut out.
The Mam one was definitely by choice. It wasn't lazy as it was big v small man, but it was definitely a decision actively made to do it. I think Mam was lucky with 1, probably deserved minimum 2.
Finch wrote:
Very underated player was Fien in my opinion, always enjoyed him at the Warriors/Kiwis
Milchcow wrote:
I know Manu is good for your Fantasy team at 6. But in real life he is not the best option for the Roosters. They should be hoping thaty Sam Walker can fix whatever deficiency in his game saw him demoted, because otherwise they are going to struggle in the long term
mattnz wrote:
He should have got more.
mattnz wrote:
I don't think he takes that much space on the team bus. Its 146 kilometers
mattnz wrote:
Better attacker, better defender than Walker.
Golden boot winner, that needs more opportunities in attack to make Roosters a better team, the judging panel for Golden Boot don't care about fantasy, just a gun player, who would be playing fullback ahead of anyone except Teddy, and gets similar opportunities to run at 6.
You want your gun attacking players in your spine. Keary and Walker are similar players, don't need both there, just need one of them to steer them around the park and your best attacking weapons at 6 and 1 to run the attack.
AL wrote:
Did you actually google maps this or is that kind of info just rollin’ around in your melon? Or is it just a very specific, Rabbitesque approximation?
Finch wrote:Crossland on the bench smh
Finch wrote:Crossland on the bench smh
Mando wrote:Matto out! Carty starting
Mando wrote:Matto out! Carty starting
Mando wrote:Matto out! Carty starting
Mando wrote:
Hmm, was going to trade out Carty... What to do, what to do...
mattnz wrote:
Anyone heard why?
Should be good for a nice bump in minutes and scoring for Hopgood too.
Could we dare to dream of back to 85 point Hopgood in 70 minutes?