SI wrote:Fox saying the Dogs paid 3.2 over 4 years for Woods.
Makes what we paid for Grub look half decent.
Less than what we offered him per year for the record.
NRL Fantasy Fanatics - A place for discussion of NRL Fantasy / Virtual Sports / Super Coach and other Fantasy Sports
SI wrote:Fox saying the Dogs paid 3.2 over 4 years for Woods.
Makes what we paid for Grub look half decent.
Pieman wrote:Woods is replaceable imo. Ted is the huge one.
Pieman wrote:Woods is replaceable imo. Ted is the huge one.
No Worries wrote:I heard Woods was offered more per year but only 3 years and Teddy also left for less but don't know numbers
SI wrote:
Offered more per year by people who don't watch and/or understand the game. Tedesco is that one player all teams want. When you are the team that actually has him you don't offer a replaceable prop more money.
Dip wrote:SI wrote:
Offered more per year by people who don't watch and/or understand the game. Tedesco is that one player all teams want. When you are the team that actually has him you don't offer a replaceable prop more money.
I think he means Dogs/Rooster offered Woods/Tedesco more per year than Tigers did, not that the Tigers offered Woods more money than Teddy.
Dip wrote:
I think he means Dogs/Rooster offered Woods/Tedesco more per year than Tigers did, not that the Tigers offered Woods more money than Teddy.
Revraiser wrote:What about Ava to the Sharks ... does this one piss Tig fans off ?
Revraiser wrote:What about Ava to the Sharks ... does this one piss Tig fans off ?
Milchcow wrote:
Only if we don't replace him.
We were already 1 prop short, and have now list are 2 starters. Brought in Matulino but need more.
Other than Russell Packer, not sure we are linked to any props right now, but hopefully we are working on someone.