Firstly guys, thanks to you for replying. When I got 40 views with no replies I was worried that I had opened up a can of worms people were objectionable to talking about (and I was just the prized asshole for wanting to dive right in), but I was really very interested in the conversation.
filthridden wrote:I'm not against the anthem and I definitely prefer it to NZ asking God to defend us but I can see maybe a few lines that might offend indigenous people and others:
"We are young and free" to a people who don't consider themselves as free as the colonials.
"In history's page, let every stage
Advance Australia Fair" - imagery of Australia's history, of course is going to be painful for some.
The anthem also mentions the Commonwealth and boundless plains to share and again, I guess I could see how those may offend some people.
Again, I'm throwing darts out here and I'd love to hear from someone who is closer to the issue than I am.
It's funny how subjective interpretation can be, I had always taken the "young and free" line to be talking about Australia itself rather than its citizens. Young because the 118 years we have been recognized as a country is incredibly short on the international stage; and free because we never passed through any totalitarian phases to get to where we are. I guess you could make an argument that even the 'young' part could offend indigenous peoples since they have been here longer than any current culture on the planet. As for the "In History's page, let every stage, Advance Australia Fair", I had assumed it was talking about the future, as in "let us make it so that history shows we are always striving for a better Australia", the intent may not have been there in 1978 when this was written, but in these modern times I think making a better future would have to be interpreted to include reconciliation and equal rights for all Australian peoples.
On the side, I actually think "God save the Queen" when sung in Maori is one of the more pleasant sounding anthems going. Maybe because I can't interpret the lyrics. I always enjoy hearing different nations anthems during Olympics and other sporting events, and I rate this version right up there (singer dependent of course).
Milchy wrote:
As filth said, its mainly the phrase "young and free" that causes issue
The original lyrics probably aren't a big hit either
When gallant Cook from Albion sailed,
To trace wide oceans o'er,
True British courage bore him on,
Til he landed on our shore.
Then here he raised Old England's flag,
The standard of the brave;
"With all her faults we love her still"
"Britannia rules the wave."
In joyful strains then let us sing
Advance Australia fair.
Ooo, I have no interpretation to excuse this one. I had never actually heard these lyrics before, very interesting. But I can definitely see how talking about Cook and the first flag raising would be a sore spot. Probably a good thing this section was cut. Britania rules the waves, yeesh. Fair point.
code delta wrote:If they want to make a stand on our anthem then no better stage. It obviously means something to them and maybe that can help others consider their POV. I'm a white fella and have always cringed at our anthem.
Do we need words in our anthem??
A bit long maybe ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2YuH-Fm8NpI
More upbeat combining old and new here. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pq78sTf80qY
Uh.... I have to be frank and admit I think both of those are terrible choices for an Anthem. Will have to pass on a didgeridoo trance mix to represent us all thanks! But I will take two of whatever you are on! (Jks)
I am not completely opposed to your idea of changing the anthem if it offends that many people though. Just for some context of my place in this debate, I would not mind if they changed the date of Australia Day- the arrival of the first fleet is in no way sentimental to me (any moreso than, say, the day we officially became a nation) and is hardly steeped in tradition since it only became the national day in 1994. I am simply not passionate enough about it to care if it got changed to make everybody happy, and struggle to see how so many people are. The flag I think we have to keep, big ugly Union Jack and all- since Australians both white and indigenous died in war carrying this flag and I am patriotic enough to respect that. The anthem I am ambivalent on, but I personally have always liked Advance Australia Fair (maybe because I never heard Milchy's removed lyrics!).
I think what upsets me most about the protesting of the anthem is that they are taking a symbol which many feel a deep patriotism for and twist it into a political tool. It is the soft-core version of flag burning. As I said above, I would have completely respected them if they decided NOT to play the anthem at all, but knowing that at some stage they would have all got together and decided to play it and disrespect it publicly is what irks me. I lean Left and am sympathetic with the plight of indigenous peoples, but it is not impossible to do so without being patriotic also. It upsets me to see something I put value in being used in that way. Even worse, disrespecting something I put value in because they are acutely aware of the fact that it will upset me is a pretty malicious move. Of course the counter-point to that is that this is the exact point of this protest, using my sentiments to gain shock value and do something people will talk about. But how can reconciliation and understanding between peoples ever happen when you are coming from a point of such animosity? Making an effort to show me that you do not care about my beliefs in an effort to make me care about yours is not the way to find a common ground.