NRL Fantasy 2019 Part 80

Brown just earned himself a nice 3 weeks out imo.

StuDogg101 wrote:Maybe the Bulldogs need to start the season assuming they're not making the 8

Mulvy wrote:

Really? I've owned him a couple of times at fullback (available at centre where you want him in years when you don't have Bateman and Nikora) and he's been underwhelming.

I had hoppa in the run home last year and he did me good

Mulvy wrote:

Really? I've owned him a couple of times at fullback (available at centre where you want him in years when you don't have Bateman and Nikora) and he's been underwhelming.

He's inconsistent so not the best pick going around that's for sure. I had him last year for the last 8 or so weeks of the season and he averaged over 50 in that time, given two of those scores he got an 80 and a 90.

If he was more consistent (and playing FB regularly), he'd be a great fantasy player because he can rack up the tackle breaks and run metres at a rapid pace.

multiple.scoregasms wrote:Now the decision on if it is worth sitting anyone for Lane's 52

Taupau, SJ, Matterson front runners if I lean that way

Gee man, hard to say no to a 52. I'd only consider it if you need it to force a differential in a h2h. Or would I, I do stupid shit.

multiple.scoregasms wrote:Now the decision on if it is worth sitting anyone for Lane's 52

Taupau, SJ, Matterson front runners if I lean that way

I'd honestly drop Taupau against the Raiders pack away from home.

my tv broke wrote:

I had hoppa in the run home last year and he did me good

Oh, okay, must have missed that one. Must have been out of trades and stopped giving a shit by then!

Just watched the Brown shoulder charge. Jeez, you'd think he at least gets a week for that. A lot of intent in it.

wolfking wrote:Just watched the Brown shoulder charge.  Jeez, you'd think he at least gets a week for that.  A lot of intent in it.

I wonder if he has any priors. No? Just a fine I reckon

I guess Moses’ first score below 50 in yonks had to come sooner or later.

Rabbits21 wrote:Brown just earned himself a nice 3 weeks out imo.

2 weeks will be sufficient.

wolfking wrote:Just watched the Brown shoulder charge.  Jeez, you'd think he at least gets a week for that.  A lot of intent in it.

Pangai would get suspended for the entirety of 2020 i'll tell you that much

Brown could be anything between none and three weeks. The disciplinary aren't exactly consistent.

Go the mighty doggies. They put the Eels off their game with a typical doggies in your face attack but as a N. Brown owner he made a real dick of himself the manus. Hopefully I get Watson back next week.

Really a lottery with the mrc and judiciary

Putting the result aside to me that was one of the best games of the year. Both sides ripping in trying to maim each other & the game went right down to there wire. It was played with 100% intensity by both teams & we finally had a game with heaps of aggro.

wolfking wrote:Just watched the Brown shoulder charge.  Jeez, you'd think he at least gets a week for that.  A lot of intent in it.

Like most of the other "late" hits I think it's bullshit. But the way they've been judging these it's late. Worse it was a shoulder charge. Worse he then started a melee. Hence my he's fucked comment. But, in my opinion (different situation) if you bring the ball right to the line, turn, pass, you're gonna get smashed and that's the way it should be. If you don't wanna be smashed, don't bring the ball right to the line, a defender who has committed to you can't pull out. It's been that way forever. Slowing it down gives me the shits. Cronk is the obvious example. I hate the expression, but the game's going soft.

I fully expect N. Brown to get the book thrown at him & he deserves it. It was an idiotic thing to do & very dumb. That shoulder charge was the culmination of about 15-20 minutes of stupid play by N. Brown. It started in the 1st half when he decided he would rush out of the line & try put a big shot on & 4 missed tackles later I was thinking what's got into him. Then it just snow balled from there to him getting sin binned. And doesn't N. Brown have the face you just want to smash.

I need to play both Pearce and SST over Mahoney's 39, don't I?

Teeth Eater wrote:I need to play both Pearce and SST over Mahoney's 39, don't I?

No guarantees but I would.