Welshy wrote:
Was no way I was bringing him back in after dumping him after R1
That's your sunk cost fallacy right there.
NRL Fantasy Fanatics - A place for discussion of NRL Fantasy / Virtual Sports / Super Coach and other Fantasy Sports
Welshy wrote:
Was no way I was bringing him back in after dumping him after R1
Basically made $200k + 8 points trading Papy > Best this week. $100k up front in the trade + $100k in value for Best.Welshy wrote:
1 try, 1 TA and 8 points more
Not busting another trade on someone with nervy role and job securityrhinoceroo wrote:
That's your sunk cost fallacy right there.
Being greedy but I wish he could accidentally get a TB or attacking statytsb wrote:
Just Twal being a beast
Great shout for this week. How many weeks until you have a bad week/trade and quit again?mattnz wrote:
Basically made $200k + 8 points trading Papy > Best this week. $100k up front in the trade + $100k in value for Best.
mattnz wrote:
Basically made $200k + 8 points trading Papy > Best this week. $100k up front in the trade + $100k in value for Best.
rhinoceroo wrote:
That's your sunk cost fallacy right there.
Welshy wrote:
Not busting another trade on someone with nervy role and job security
Welshy wrote:
Tough choice for those who don’t have any of them but need to replace Capewell like myself. Both will be similar price. I can’t trust SMat after getting burnt many times before.
I agree mate.rhinoceroo wrote:
That's va different issue, and fair enough. But if you're holding off because you had him earlier then sold him for nothing then that's sunk cost.
mattnz wrote:
Basically made $200k + 8 points trading Papy > Best this week. $100k up front in the trade + $100k in value for Best.
Camo123 wrote:
Being greedy but I wish he could accidentally get a TB or attacking stat
Absolutely zero point in reasoning or logic. Just doesn’t workMulvy wrote:
That's twice you've said 100k profit for Best. You mean this week? I don't think so. But his BE should be low enough to get up to the 100k mark next week. Also, does that mean you are selling him?
I love pain so would consider the punt if he was nailed on for 80. Was his 66 and 40 minute games injury related?Mulvy wrote:
Yeah I've done the SMat thing a couple of times. Never again.