NRL Fantasy 2020 Part 36 How about dem 2RFs

Take Hammers 40 points or play Rudolf ?

Welshy wrote:
Pretty much same position

Yeah middle forward. Not like they do anything in the scrum

Revraiser wrote:

I'm 42yo, come on man !

Haha, I'm 42!

Loomer wrote:

Yeah middle forward. Not like they do anything in the scrum

Group cuddle should be the name not scrum these days

EJ24 wrote:Take Hammers 40 points or play Rudolf ?

That's the line right there. Tough call. I'd probably take a punt on Toby but flip a coin.

I don’t really think starting changes Rudolf role/minutes too much. I’ve got JTBs 47 in the loop anyway.

PSA: if you’re using Kennedy for a loop. He is now playing and you will get his score if you do not move him.

Just fuckn realised this myself didn’t I

Erin Moleman wrote:For anyone with Ben Hunt in a draft, would you sit him for Clune ?

Thanks for reminding me I have Ben Hunt in a draft!

I’m miles ahead in my matchup so will leave him, tough call if I needed the points. TBH, I think hold - Clune might only be good for 30, Hunt could get 30 in 25mins at hooker

EJ24 wrote:Take Hammers 40 points or play Rudolf ?

Rudolf 40+

Interview on 9, Mary just said 'Hunt will come on at the 25min mark and, depending on how the game is, will stay there the rest of the game'

No idea if it's:

- Dufty off and Norman to fb, Hunt half
- Norman/Clune off, Hunt half
- McInnes to lock, Merrin off, Hunt hooker

Dragons roulette

Welshy wrote:
Pretty much same position

been thinking about that lately from a fantasy standpoint, think it would be more true to life these days if starting positions were re-arranged into having 3 middle forwards (featured props and locks) and 2 edge forwards (second rowers), don't know if it would change much if at all from a strategy standpoint, but it seems silly for example in Twal's case, where he'll get added second row designation, even though his role has not changed an inch from when he had a props number on his back.

Shady2K wrote:Interview on 9, Mary just said 'Hunt will come on at the 25min mark and, depending on how the game is, will stay there the rest of the game'

That was my thinking but if they start well And he ends up getting 0mins I’m stuffed hahah

Shady2K wrote:Interview on 9, Mary just said 'Hunt will come on at the 25min mark and, depending on how the game is, will stay there the rest of the game'

Whoever was asking about McInnes, if he plays most of the game at lock and a total of 80 minutes, he is a no brainer to bring in.

Mulvy wrote:

That's the line right there. Tough call. I'd probably take a punt on Toby but flip a coin.

Ordinarily I would take the 40 points and run. Rudolf at lock could seems like a good punt. Best case he goes 50+, worse case he gets a 35 and I miss out on 5 points.

Shady2K wrote:Interview on 9, Mary just said 'Hunt will come on at the 25min mark and, depending on how the game is, will stay there the rest of the game'

No idea if it's:

- Dufty off and Norman to fb, Hunt half
- Norman/Clune off, Hunt half
- McInnes to lock, Merrin off, Hunt hooker

Dragons roulette

Mez is a fat bastard, he’ll come off and McInnes lock for sure, Graham will play front row now

Rudolf averaging 1ppm this season. So yea expecting 40 from him. Assuming he gets close to 50 mins

EJ24 wrote:

Ordinarily I would take the 40 points and run. Rudolf at lock could seems like a good punt. Best case he goes 50+, worse case he gets a 35 and I miss out on 5 points.

Yeah that's my thinking also. Taking the 40 does give you HIA insurance though.

How about Hammers 40 or play Lomax?

EJ24 wrote:Take Hammers 40 points or play Rudolf ?

I'd probably roll the dice with Rudolf.

wolfking wrote:How about Hammers 40 or play Lomax?

Lomax due a dud score, take the 40 imo.