Mulvy wrote:
Is that the taco kid grown up
What the hell
NRL Fantasy Fanatics - A place for discussion of NRL Fantasy / Virtual Sports / Super Coach and other Fantasy Sports
Mulvy wrote:
Oh good to hear.Thickshake wrote:
Yeah he was fine. Cowboys stifled their attack a bit on that edge but he did have a try disallowed and almost put Staines over once only for him to get bundled into touch. It's going to be my biggest regret going Averillo over him, last call I was agonising over this week and opted to keep some extra cash ITB.
Welshy wrote:
Agree mate looked for the life of me they were targeting that Manly left edge. The roosters right edge will be more dominant but in a closer game the play will spread
Rapture_NRL wrote:
Yeah I'm weighing this up too. I went Munster and Capewell instead of Cleary. Netted me more points but 105 from 2 or 96/192 from 1 lol
Syzy wrote:I have a decision as to whether I take Twal or Macca.
I currently have Twal and from a team balance perspective he's probably what I need. But Macca is tempting me...
2018/19 Macca averaged 53 from his 70+ minute games (avg 79mins).
Then 2020 he averages 65 from his 7 x 80min games, including 2 tries. He's priced at 54 and I assume will effectively play 80 mins each week. Is there anyone likely to steal minutes? I expect he can average around 60 but not sure about 65.
Twal had an interrupted season last year, averaging 53 from 59 minutes. This includes 6 games <55mins and 5 games >55mins. We know he's capable of playing 70+ minutes and with the makeup of the tigers bench I'm interested in who replaces him. If he can get 70mins he could certainly average around 63.
Keen to hear thoughts.
I think ya need to drop a player and then see what you have when you go back to choose a new player and do a bit of math. Not idealSoylentGreen wrote:Is there any way to see how much cash you have on the app?
SoylentGreen wrote:Is there any way to see how much cash you have on the app?
Mulvy wrote:
Seriously though, it's another one of those ones where doesn't matter which way you go, it could be the wrong call. Trade out Bird and nek minnut he's starting lock scoring 50+. Keep bird, he stays at centre but is less effective coming back from injury in a worse team. I'd stick with my original gut call.
Syzy wrote:I have a decision as to whether I take Twal or Macca.
I currently have Twal and from a team balance perspective he's probably what I need. But Macca is tempting me...
2018/19 Macca averaged 53 from his 70+ minute games (avg 79mins).
Then 2020 he averages 65 from his 7 x 80min games, including 2 tries. He's priced at 54 and I assume will effectively play 80 mins each week. Is there anyone likely to steal minutes? I expect he can average around 60 but not sure about 65.
Twal had an interrupted season last year, averaging 53 from 59 minutes. This includes 6 games <55mins and 5 games >55mins. We know he's capable of playing 70+ minutes and with the makeup of the tigers bench I'm interested in who replaces him. If he can get 70mins he could certainly average around 63.
Keen to hear thoughts.
Ramitinmyhaaas wrote:Why is everyone just assuming Lam goes to Hooker in Friend's absence? Wouldn't it just be Lussick... when he filled in last year he did a great job and was even trusted by Robbo in big games. What's the point of messing around with combinations so early on in the season by moving your 6 to hooker when there is a perfectly capable 9 waiting in the background. Doesn't make sense to me.
Ramitinmyhaaas wrote:Why is everyone just assuming Lam goes to Hooker in Friend's absence? Wouldn't it just be Lussick... when he filled in last year he did a great job and was even trusted by Robbo in big games. What's the point of messing around with combinations so early on in the season by moving your 6 to hooker when there is a perfectly capable 9 waiting in the background. Doesn't make sense to me.
Camo123 wrote:
Lussick not in top 30 from what I can see on NRL website, probably means he can't start
I'll admit I wasn't thinking of that with earlier comment, but consideration to make
Liverpool_Bulldog wrote:
Oh good to hear.
I feel like I’ve done alright this round but seem be well behind some of the scores being posted. Onwards and upwards I suppose