NRL Fantasy 2020 Part 25 - Sending out an SOS

Weiland wrote:Who would you guys play in your lineup out of Leniu, Stefano and Alvaro? Really need to get a stronger Middle for my 13.

That order for me this week.
Leniu, Stefano, Alvaro

Goodnight Kiwi wrote:

That order for me this week.
Leniu, Stefano, Alvaro

Stefano against Eels big boys, Alvaro against Knights big boys and Leniu (Panthers) rolling forward all night through the Sea Eagles + the added fact the game might be a blow out and Leniu may get an extended run it has to be Leniu*


*Note I am also playing Leniu

Welshy wrote:
Tracey if he had more weeks but Ramien returning is bunk

Tracey isn't a CTR anyway. If I was going that route I'd just rab Walker.

IF you knew that Hampton was locked in to play half for a month or two, then he'd probably be a great pick as DPP cover.

That's a pretty big IF though.

Milchcow wrote:

Tracey isn't a CTR anyway. If I was going that route I'd just rab Walker.

100a% just grab Walker then

StormTrooper96 wrote:

Stefano against Eels big boys, Alvaro against Knights big boys and Leniu (Panthers) rolling forward all night through the Sea Eagles + the added fact the game might be a blow out and Leniu may get an extended run it has to be Leniu*


*Note I am also playing Leniu

Makes sense. I just know until I get a keeper in that position that I will roulette with these guys every week and always pick wrong.

Surely Knights bench doesn't stay that way? Can see Green and Mann swap being imminent with Mann being the much better bench utility?

StormTrooper96 wrote:Surely Knights bench doesn't stay that way? Can see Green and Mann swap being imminent with Mann being the much better bench utility?

I reckon Mann ends up at centre with Tex the 14 when Knights are full strength

Welshy wrote:
100a% just grab Walker then

Problem with that is that if Roberts or Bird are out next week (or anytime soon), then I have to spend a trade on a shitty CTR then, or play with 16 again. sure one might have fallen in price enough to make it worthwhile, but better off getting some points and cover now.

Any cash Walker makes probably won't offset the lost points from playing short

multiple.scoregasms wrote:

I reckon Mann ends up at centre with Tex the 14 when Knights are full strength

Wouldn't centres be Tuala and Best with To'a and Hunt wings... maybe bench would be 14. Mann 15. Sue/Watson 16. Saifiti 17. Fitzgibbon?

NRL.com suggests Morgan should be back next week? That's gonna fk Hampton. Is the whole injury retirement thing.. a thing?

I watch all Sharks games and think a position needs to be made for Tracey. Their attack is terribly pedestrian and in desperate need of some speed.

Milchcow wrote:

Honestly, is there anyone you would rather play at $302k or less

I would've suggested Kris but he's $303k. Ouch.
Also didn't realise Pompey was so expensive.

In short - not at centre, no. Taulagi looks like the only other option. Payten seems to rate him.

Goodnight Kiwi wrote:

That order for me this week.
Leniu, Stefano, Alvaro

I'm playing Leniu over Fuimaono this week. May not be my smartest move but we'll see how it plays out.
Need to bring in an EDG otherwise I don't have cover when I'm playing Fui in MID.

Does Niukore get dpp with Waqa now out indefinitely?

StormTrooper96 wrote:

Wouldn't centres be Tuala and Best with To'a and Hunt wings... maybe bench would be 14. Mann 15. Sue/Watson 16. Saifiti 17. Fitzgibbon?

Mann is a much better player than Tuala and his run first mindset fits centre. I'd rather have Hoy in the 17 somewhere than Tuala. Gives a lot of positional coverage between Mann, Hoy and Watson in case of injuries

Erin Moleman wrote:Does Niukore get dpp with Waqa now out indefinitely?

If still CTR after Rd 6

Erin Moleman wrote:Does Niukore get dpp with Waqa now out indefinitely?

Seems likely

Next DPP meant to be after Round 6, but Suaalii randomly got DPP in the past week, so who knows, maybe they'll make another exception.

Milchcow wrote:

Seems likely

Next DPP meant to be after Round 6, but Suaalii randomly got DPP in the past week, so who knows, maybe they'll make another exception.

Don't think they'd do it for player that's played games this season.

Loomer wrote:

Don't think they'd do it for player that's played games this season.

It makes more sense to give CTR eligibility to someone who has actually played CTR in first grade than someone who has not.