NRL Fantasy 2021 Part 34 - Team List Tuesday Treachery

Boozecluez wrote:

When was the last time you held a milf?

They weren't technically milf's when I held them

Boozecluez wrote:Anyone ever read Freakonomics back in the day?

I'm no stats data economist ramesh like most here, merely a part time stay at home dad
But it was an interesting book and how stats can be used

Yep! It's an enjoyable read, although a few of the papers it references haven't stood up well to more testing. But in general it's a good introduction to how labour/micro folks think about econometrics.

Which I think is maybe the best lesson in the book - beware of really cute stories that gloss over missed causality or small sample biases, and instead think hard about the underlying processes.

Apologies for my great mood, game day and this arrived
Haven't had one in 10 years, used to take them for granted growing up

Rabbits21 wrote:

I’m really finding it hard to decide!

Would you say you're close to panicking?

Beaker:

Mulvy wrote:

Would you say you're close to panicking?

Beaker - EDITED :

Haha I was expecting this beaker given lockout is in hours...
Edited it for you

Boozecluez wrote:

I used to think I was indecisive too, but now I am not so sure

Boozecluez wrote:Apologies for my great mood, game day and this arrived
Haven't had one in 10 years, used to take them for granted growing up

Don't do this to me

Boozecluez wrote:

Haha I was expecting this given lockout is in hours...

Haha, fooled ya! Nah saving that one for later this evening.

Boozecluez wrote:Apologies for my great mood, game day and this arrived
Haven't had one in 10 years, used to take them for granted growing up

What are these bad boys? Guava ?

Mulvy wrote:

Haha, fooled ya! Nah saving that one for later this evening.

Bastard and here I thought you were just shitposting for Chewie so he gets a party in before the game

L-Jimmy wrote:

Yep! It's an enjoyable read, although a few of the papers it references haven't stood up well to more testing. But in general it's a good introduction to how labour/micro folks think about econometrics.

Which I think is maybe the best lesson in the book - beware of really cute stories that gloss over missed causality or small sample biases, and instead think hard about the underlying processes.

That book and History of Economic Thought probably the two most accessible reads on economics, at least that I'm aware of. If you read those and watch Alan Kohler for 5 minutes on ABC most night for about three months (so you get exposure to GDP, CPI and Labour Force), you can pretty much get through most economic discussions. Not the ones with actual academics or the maths obviously.

Jele wrote:really struggling with my bench this week. which two would you leave out from Schuster, Jensen, Leniu, Simpkin, Walker, and Croker?

Thinking in that order - Walker will struggle against the Storm and Croker has Cust back on the Manly bench.

Can you loop anyone?
Gut feeling Leniu scores a try tonight.
Croker has to be left out and I agree with you on Walker v Storm

I see lots of people saying no harm in waiting a week on Simpkin.

Not to toot my own horn, but Schuster, SOS, Walker, I grabbed each of them the first week they were named to play, and it paid dividends. Not just financially, but it left me feeling a step ahead of many others when the weekly chat was "should I get SOS, should I get Walker" etc when I already had them in the team and looking at what the next move was.

Next week I'll be looking at Haas/Turbo because I won't be thinking about now it's time to get Simpkin.

I'm grabbing Simpkin straight away. My only potential worry is that Liddle is getting "rested" or has some minor niggle we haven't been told about. But I don't believe that is the case, and I feel like if he lives up to any of the hype he should have no problem locking his spot down over a guy who realistically isn't that flash, in a team that realistically isn't competing for fuck all this year and should be having one eye to the future and getting guys like Simpkin experience for a few years down the track when they can compete.

Fortune favours the brave.

Rabbits21 wrote:Thanks Chucky mate but I’m not budging love the banter and I see what you’re trying to do

I still don’t know which way I’m going.
I’ve narrowed it down to Haas v Tohu.

Mulvy wrote:

Would you say you're close to panicking?

Beaker:

No a calmness have just come over me Haas it is get Tohu later!

Brodie Croft MOTM

rectangle wrote:

What are these bad boys? Guava ?

I googled avocado and they kinda look the same.. Don't think anyone eats those though. I think I had a guava once and it wasn't bad.

Throw in Adam Elliott too

Mulvy wrote:

Would you say you're close to panicking?

Beaker:

Tis a fine barn Conical flask English, but to be sure it is no pool Beaker

Wow 8 upvotes for Haas 50-60mins.

Only 2 downvotes for over 60mins!

I think he defs plays at least 60mins.