NRL Fantasy 2021 Part 47 - Another one bites the dust

Ahhhhhhhhhhhh, I still can't decide Walsh or Simpkin!!!!

8/469 C for me.

my tv broke wrote:Im not/cant play simpkin now so you should all play him for a 70

Simpkin ATS at 6.50. Bit short tbh but i am on

I can’t decide on Cini or Walsh

Snatchpato wrote:For those who watched the game, how did Klem look? I really like the idea of him in my team as a consistent guy like Tohu, but really not sure on him considering only 50 minutes. If he looks the goods and looks out of favour for Origin, I might take a punt on the lad.

Getting hard to ignore, probably 580k-ish next week. Might get bigger minutes in R13.

Simpkin or Stefano?

Think I'll go Simpkin over Stefan. Liddle is going to have to be good defensively when he comes on or else he'll get subbed surely.

Liverpool_Bulldog wrote:I can’t decide on Cini or Walsh

I’d say Walsh, way more upside.

my tv broke wrote:

Simpkin ATS at 6.50. Bit short tbh but i am on

Right. Simpkin it is then

Just a bit of math hoping it's correct:

Knights have 1x HOK 3x MID 2x EDG = 6 x 80 = 480 minutes available in the forwards. 
Brailey takes 80, leaves 400 left. 
Frizell plays 80, 320 left.
Barnett, Watson split the lock role plus a small amount of overlap for 90 minutes between them, 230 left.
Fitzy and Jones split the other EDG position with some overlap for 90 minutes between them, 140 left.
JSai averages 35 mins off the bench, 105 left.
DSai averaging 56 mins starting, 49 left.
Now you've got Sue grabbing minutes plus Klemmer fitting his (ideally) big minutes in, and the math just doesn't add up.

Who's losing minutes here (who have I overestimated), and is it Klem/Watson?

my tv broke wrote:

Simpkin ATS at 6.50. Bit short tbh but i am on

He always looks likely for one. I'm surprised so many people are split between him and Stefano when he has so much more upside

multiple.scoregasms wrote:

I'd roll the dice on both. Downside you are looking at 5 points or so, upside you could be 20 points better off

Thanks MS, sage advice as always

Simpkin in 18 for me. Alvaro comes in if he doesn't score well enough

Krump wrote:
He always looks likely for one. I'm surprised so many people are split between him and Stefano when he has so much more upside

Stefano doesn't mind a try either (for a guy who mostly plays bench prop)

Wife sent me to the supermarket. In effect she chose Walsh for me haha

Krump wrote:
He always looks likely for one. I'm surprised so many people are split between him and Stefano when he has so much more upside

Yeah I'm thinking they're both good for mid-30s, but Simpkin with the higher ceiling.

Cini drops the ball cold

Rabbits21 wrote:Fuck I’ve still gotta figure out if I play Simpkin or Uto, aarrggghhh I’ll go Simpkin.

I’m playing both of that makes you feel better

Cini knock on ffs!

Ah....Cini......