NRL Fantasy 2021 Part 55 - Beanz Meanz Heinz

my tv broke wrote:Game is in trouble when those are sin bins imo

Thought the ref in our game was good with that side of things

mattnz wrote:
ruled offside at marker

He was as square as you could be only moved after brailey stepped out from DH

Annoying when refs go for the whistle when things can be legal just not normal

Ramitinmyhaaas wrote:Lowkey Aidan Tolman watch???

I've had Aiden* the last few weeks. Tackle bot. Seems to have his old Bulldogs role now. Cheap from the run of benched games and looks like Fifita is back to being on the outer.

Cancel expansion. Cull two teams.

14 team comp.

Broncos can go.

Bird cheeky TO there for the easiest 1-on-1 steal of all time?

Bin

if that isnt a professional foul what is? hits the guy high to stop a try

Just caught up on the first game. Happy with all my scorers (Laurie, Walsh, Tohu, Lucy).

Should have bloody traded Simpkin after all.

Literally a reckless swinging arm - should've been a sinbin in the old interpretation of the rules.

That was a Ramsey bumper cart ride

i mean i guess if the Vaughan is a sin-bin then that is too, but they're both actually just a penalty and move on ffs

surmo13 wrote:i mean i guess if the Vaughan is a sin-bin then that is too, but they're both actually just a penalty and move on ffs

Chambers should've been a sin bin, for being Will Chambers.

my tv broke wrote:Cancel expansion. Cull two teams.

14 team comp.

Broncos can go.

Still can't believe how lucky we are getting this absolute blockbuster of a game on a Friday night on Free to Air!

surmo13 wrote:i mean i guess if the Vaughan is a sin-bin then that is too, but they're both actually just a penalty and move on ffs

It looked more of a sin-bin than the Vaughan one, but it's not easy controlling the height of contact in a cover tackle where you're diving in from a full-speed run against a jinking player. Different category to going high standing still in the defensive line, but the refs wouldn't know this because they've never played the game.

No LBA for bird on the Ramsay play?

rhinoceroo wrote:

It looked more of a sin-bin than the Vaughan one, but it's not easy controlling the height of contact in a cover tackle where you're diving in from a full-speed run against a jinking player. Different category to going high standing still in the defensive line, but the refs wouldn't know this because they've never played the game.

Lol I don't think the difficulty of the situation should have any bearing on it mate. You either hit a guy in the head or you don't, you don't get let off because you were running fast

SoylentGreen wrote:No LBA for bird on the Ramsay play?

No LB for Ramsay so can’t have a LBA with no LB

BCT05 wrote:

Lol I don't think the difficulty of the situation should have any bearing on it mate. You either hit a guy in the head or you don't, you don't get let off because you were running fast

Eh? Of course it has a bearing on it

SoylentGreen wrote:No LBA for bird on the Ramsay play?

Nah that kind of LBA only counts if your name is Nathan

Sheesh what does Nathan Brown have against Walsh? "You blokes highlight all the good parts but he's got some parts he needs to work on too" "Our best player tonight was Tohu, reece was great but Tohu was our best player". Agree with the Tohu call but surely this is abit harsh - unless he's just trying to play down his media attention... Thoughts??