NRL Fantasy 2021 Part 77 - To'o tired to think of a witty title

ytsb wrote:Kinda wish Harris was still out so I could get Savages 71

robelgordo wrote:Caught up - watched all the kayo minis for yesterday games.

Surely someone should have the job to make sure teams playing each other both don’t wear white? Would take 5 mins a week?

Liverpool_Bulldog wrote:Change of subject needed. Radley playing 70 minutes is lovely

poisoncup wrote:J Brailey continues to be frustrating. Has been posting sub-50 scores for 6 of the last 7 weeks, but has lost so much money and isn’t scoring low enough for me to consider him an immediate sell. Have the feeling he’ll just hang around my squad all year.

poisoncup wrote:J Brailey continues to be frustrating. Has been posting sub-50 scores for 6 of the last 7 weeks, but has lost so much money and isn’t scoring low enough for me to consider him an immediate sell. Have the feeling he’ll just hang around my squad all year.

Weiland wrote:Will miss the games today because I am working. I work in insurance so I will be flat out for days with all the flooding going on. Usually missing Warrior games is better for my stress levels but I hope they can pull something out today.

poisoncup wrote:J Brailey continues to be frustrating. Has been posting sub-50 scores for 6 of the last 7 weeks, but has lost so much money and isn’t scoring low enough for me to consider him an immediate sell. Have the feeling he’ll just hang around my squad all year.

Jumping Marlin wrote:

poisoncup wrote:J Brailey continues to be frustrating. Has been posting sub-50 scores for 6 of the last 7 weeks, but has lost so much money and isn’t scoring low enough for me to consider him an immediate sell. Have the feeling he’ll just hang around my squad all year.

Re JBrailey:  

At start of year the consensus seemed to be he was a good cash cow and might average mid to high 40's. 50 at a pinch.  

When he was rocking a 65+ average after the first 10 matches I thought "we were wrong and he's a new super gun".  

But maybe I should have thought "we were right, he's just having a purple patch".  

ynot wrote:A few notes from the round so far, it's been an interesting one for sure.

Par Score for the Top 1000 is 671. (This score is the sum of points for first 17 listed "playing" players for each team, it should be reasonably accurate, some looping might make this a bit low, but should be more accurate than just counting the first 17 players.)

An average of 12 players used.

96% of teams have used their captain.

1 team broke my code because they have Trbo and DCE as their C and VC.

Here's a chart, you can use it to tell if you are above or below par for the amount of players you have used. If you are above the blue line for your players used count, congratulations you are above par (for the moment!).

filthridden wrote:578 +

AFB
Walsh
Burton
Haas
Gamble
Doueihi
Reynolds

Very poddy run for me today. Haas at 41%, Burton at 44% and Walsh at 95% are the highest owner players I have. All others <15% owned in the top 5000.
Big games from Reynolds, Gamble, Douehi and AFB could see me fly up the rankings. Fingers crossed!

Chewie wrote:I don't understand why AOB is sticking with bringing Watson on at the 20 mins mark especially against a team like the Storm. They were 18 points behind already by the time he came on.