sgdragons10 wrote:yeah ive already got matto and murray, the other option was frizz but not too sure on him?
damn I've got none of them so they're all being considered ... spoiled for choice making it harder for me
NRL Fantasy Fanatics - A place for discussion of NRL Fantasy / Virtual Sports / Super Coach and other Fantasy Sports
sgdragons10 wrote:yeah ive already got matto and murray, the other option was frizz but not too sure on him?
mintotheimmortal wrote:
damn I've got none of them so they're all being considered ... spoiled for choice making it harder for me
sgdragons10 wrote:so... why friz over jackson?
wolfking wrote:
Higher ceiling. More entertaining to watch. Slightly lower floor but the upside to go large makes up for it.
Better looking too with a much better rig.
wolfking wrote:
Higher ceiling. More entertaining to watch. Slightly lower floor but the upside to go large makes up for it.
Better looking too with a much better rig.
wolfking wrote:
Higher ceiling. More entertaining to watch. Slightly lower floor but the upside to go large makes up for it.
Better looking too with a much better rig.
Lemmy KGB wrote:
I can tell you from experience you wouldn't even know he existed if you didn't own him in fantasy. He's a maximum effort/not overly skilled kind of guy, and I love it!
filthridden wrote:If Cleary plays 80 and "only" scores 55 or 60 this week, will you still be afraid of captaining him next week?
wolfking wrote:
You know what, I haven't noticed him either haha. I just know I'd rather watch him than JJ.
Lemmy KGB wrote:
Yeah I did actually mean JJ but looking back that wasn't very clear
Lemmy KGB wrote:I don't think you/I can get Cleary if it leaves 0 trades
Mulvy wrote:
Yeah I can. Whether it's wise or not is another story.