NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 15 - dropping fantasy points for fun

Is JFH injured?

I’m a laughable 369 with 5 to come

Mulvy wrote:

It's above the line.  So yep.

Never been to good with graphs haha

Not sure if it’s been mentioned here, but it appears Wilton is missing a minimum of one week.

ForanAgainst wrote:Not sure if it’s been mentioned here, but it appears Wilton is missing a minimum of one week.

Of course he is

Looks like I’m playing Nanai in the 13 next week

WT2K wrote:12/473 with Haas (c), Mann, Randall, Tuilagi & M. King to play

Same score players and C but Burton also

Chewie wrote:



Keep in mind that this is based on the top 1000 after 1 round, which is a very small sample size and is not an accurate indication of where the average fantasy community is at. It feels about right though

Good point. Top 1,000 will be heavily biased to Haas owners (as can be seen by the high rate of red dots).

mrbrownstone wrote:Was at a mates' and only had the footy on in the backgroud yesterday, so a couple of questions:

- Mahoney 51 with a try is pretty underwhelming, any worries there or just need to wait for a big game from him?
- Lolo minute watch: did he not get more because they won comfortably, is that just his ceiling this year?
- How in the everloving fuck did Nanai get -28 in demerits? Were they actual missed tackles, or the bump off/break early type?
- Any other fantasy relevant news from yesterday?

Mahoneys tackle counts are way down on his usual average, even before pvl ball. Both games so far have had low tackle counts across the board for the eels. Eels only had two players yesterday over 30 tacklrs. Youd think this changes...

Lolo.. played well. Looked to be ripping in. Stats dont reflect it but he was good. Probably would have come back on if game was on the line. Still probably questions over wheyher he can return to 55+ scoring..

Nanai played better than -28. He did have a few errors etc but a lot of negatives were stuff that the coach would love to see. Hes a gun footy player, fantasy scores may not always reflect it

Liverpool_Bulldog wrote:Does that mean 606 with 13 players used including captain is decent so far?

"oh I so worried about my dick size! It's only slightly longer than a Subaru Outback, is that decent?"


away'n shite

L-Jimmy wrote:

"oh I so worried about my dick size! It's only slightly longer than a Subaru Outback, is that decent?"


away'n shite

L-Jimmy wrote:

"oh I so worried about my dick size! It's only slightly longer than a Subaru Outback, is that decent?"


away'n shite

After the first round I’ll take any slight increase in dick size as a positive.

MF wrote:

MFs dealing with a slight inverted Penisini scenario at the moment

Liverpool_Bulldog wrote:
MFs dealing with a slight inverted Penisini scenario at the moment

It’s coming out the back end

I rage traded Ponga last night for Wighton. Not the worst but not the best.

I don’t know how there’s such a difference with stats. Like fantasy has lodge down for 9 tackles but fox has him down for 14? I don’t get how there can be such a difference surely tackles are the easiest and most obvious stats to give out

I've got to roll the dice in a H2H matchup and play Walters over King or Tuilagi. Who would be the best to drop?

L-Jimmy wrote:

"oh I so worried about my dick size! It's only slightly longer than a Subaru Outback, is that decent?"


away'n shite

One of my favourite sayings!!

my tv broke wrote:

Mahoneys tackle counts are way down on his usual average, even before pvl ball. Both games so far have had low tackle counts across the board for the eels. Eels only had two players yesterday over 30 tacklrs. Youd think this changes...

Lolo.. played well. Looked to be ripping in. Stats dont reflect it but he was good. Probably would have come back on if game was on the line. Still probably questions over wheyher he can return to 55+ scoring..

Nanai played better than -28. He did have a few errors etc but a lot of negatives were stuff that the coach would love to see. Hes a gun footy player, fantasy scores may not always reflect it

Thanks mate

MF wrote:I don’t know how there’s such a difference with stats. Like fantasy has lodge down for 9 tackles but fox has him down for 14? I don’t get how there can be such a difference surely tackles are the easiest and most obvious stats to give out

I agree. Last week I noticed Nanai's missed tackle count was;

NRL Fantasy = 1
Supercoach = 2
VSDT = 7

The large variations between the stat groups are ridiculous.

sbr202 wrote:I've got to roll the dice in a H2H matchup and play Walters over King or Tuilagi. Who would be the best to drop?

I'd drop Ming.

Tuilagi got big minutes last week, and now Garner is gone too.

Ming who knows what he gets. Probably gets 30 minutes, and he can certainly smash out a decent score in that time. But I'd rather take the edge that's looking like a 70-80 minute option.