NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 17 is the new 50

Aardvark wrote:

Me too....surely there is some reaction with all of the stick they have been copping this week and against everyone's favourite enigmas as well.

You could say surely there's some reaction from the Warriors too, they're in the same boat


Two shit teams, continuing on their shit ways. Who will be less shit first?

Warriors will be less shit than the Tigers tonight

Doggies paying 3.70 over Manly looks tasty. Manly's pack isn't looking brutal, could be an upset looming.

That said, TTurbo is due. Wonder how much TPJ and Mad Jack can shut him down.

Hmmm....Doggies, Titans and Knights winning pays at 26. That's really very interesting considering they're against out of form or injury hit teams.

Moanaman wrote:Warriors will be less shit than the Tigers tonight

My money is on the same.

Regulator wrote:

Aardvark wrote:

Me too....surely there is some reaction with all of the stick they have been copping this week and against everyone's favourite enigmas as well.

You could say surely there's some reaction from the Warriors too, they're in the same boat


Two shit teams, continuing on their shit ways. Who will be less shit first?

Fiddy on a Draw it is.

I want Walsh in my team. Is Mann>Walsh crazy?

L-Jimmy wrote:Doggies paying 3.70 over Manly looks tasty. Manly's pack isn't looking brutal, could be an upset looming.

That said, TTurbo is due. Wonder how much TPJ and Mad Jack can shut him down.

Hmmm....Doggies, Titans and Knights winning pays at 26. That's really very interesting considering they're against out of form or injury hit teams.

worth a tenner mate.

think i'm set on Coates/Lolo out, but do they go for Sexton/Starling or Leo/Yeo?

Edit: scratch that, dunno why i thought option A would work, nowhere near enough money, let try that again - Lolo/Clark -> Sexton/Starling or Lolo/Coates -> Leo/Yeo?

Loomer wrote:I want Walsh in my team. Is Mann>Walsh crazy?

Keep the Faith, Bro

Moanaman wrote:

Keep the Faith, Bro

A Warriors reference. That's a yes to Walsh then?

syn13 wrote:think i'm set on Coates/Lolo out, but do they go for Sexton/Starling or Leo/Yeo?

Edit: scratch that, dunno why i thought option A would work, nowhere near enough money, let try that again - Lolo/Clark -> Sexton/Starling or Lolo/Coates -> Leo/Yeo?

Sexton / Starling because they are going to be long term options. Yeo will perform well in the short term, but then back to normal, losing cash. Leo is likely a trade out in a few weeks.

mattnz wrote:Yeo will perform well in the short term, but then back to normal, losing cash.

is there any reason people believe this other than we are fantasy coaches who know what real coaches are doing?

mattnz wrote:
Sexton / Starling because they are going to be long term options. Yeo will perform well in the short term, but then back to normal, losing cash. Leo is likely a trade out in a few weeks.

I'm not sure how Yeo can be easily written off as a non keeper.  I did pick him up sub 700K but can see his average over the year easily around 50.

my tv broke wrote:

is there any reason people believe this other than we are fantasy coaches who know what real coaches are doing?

Yeo is playing big minutes, as Captain in Cleary's absence and covering for injuries. As soon as JFH is back and fit, they will give him a rest during games, reducing his scoring.

mattnz wrote:

Yeo is playing big minutes, as Captain in Cleary's absence and covering for injuries. As soon as JFH is back and fit, they will give him a rest during games, reducing his scoring.

based on your opinion or something that someone with credentials has said?

if that's your opinion, that's fine. doesnt make it certain of happening.

robelgordo wrote:Tigers situation looks so bad I’m picking them to win tonight

This is all too true, Tigers only ever turn up when the odds are stacked against them.
$2.35 on Sportsbet, not far from activating Beastmode.

wolfking wrote:

I'm not sure how Yeo can be easily written off as a non keeper.  I did pick him up sub 700K but can see his average over the year easily around 50.

Didnt say he was a non keeper, but expect him to revert back to last years minutes and scoring when he isnt required to play 80 minutes each week. I expect many would trade him out again when losing cash before Origin.

my tv broke wrote:

based on your opinion or something that someone with credentials has said?

if that's your opinion, that's fine. doesnt make it certain of happening.

Every season of Yeo playing lock has proven this to be the case. When they need him to step up short-term, he does, but has never consistently played 80 each week. Currently they need it from him, but won't when the troops are back. It isnt rocket science to see that this is the way it has always been. Have a look at the start of 2020, then what happened the rest of the season.

mattnz wrote:
Every season of Yeo playing lock has proven this to be the case. When they need him to step up short-term, he does, but has never consistently played 80 each week. Currently they need it from him, but won't when the troops are back. It isnt rocket science to see that this is the way it has always been. Have a look at the start of 2020, then what happened the rest of the season.

so yes, it is your opinion

my tv broke wrote:

so yes, it is your opinion

Everyone has one, mine is based on historical facts.