Aardvark wrote:Has anyone got anyone in the next course of this Rugby League degustation or are we just watching for the love of the game
Clark banner incoming mate.
NRL Fantasy Fanatics - A place for discussion of NRL Fantasy / Virtual Sports / Super Coach and other Fantasy Sports
Aardvark wrote:Has anyone got anyone in the next course of this Rugby League degustation or are we just watching for the love of the game
Aardvark wrote:Has anyone got anyone in the next course of this Rugby League degustation or are we just watching for the love of the game
Milchcow wrote:
If you think Grant will score more, why don't you just buy him instead?
Nobody is forcing you to buy the players who score less points.
Bethany_B wrote:
70 is nice but Grant will get an 80 just to ruin any potential POD advantage.
Grant is 62% owned in the top 5k, Cook is 11%, so I need Grant to get sub 70 to get any advantage, and the way he's going that's unlikely
I had Munster get 80 last week but it meant nothing when Grant and Teddy both got more
AL wrote:
I don’t own either Grant or Cook. Or Munster. Take the 70 and blame Cookie the little cheater for it not being 80.
Boozecluez wrote:Almost drink o clock
Might have a 'Damien Cook'
Its like a sex on the beach except its has a layer of salt on the bottom for the last few sips
Served with beach sprint quotes as they make it for you
robelgordo wrote:I just worked out that if I owned all the players that scored more points than the players I do own, I’d be 1st overall.
Pookus McFly wrote:Is it too close to R13 to consider Gilbert>Robson? Gilbagz has a three round average of 35 and about to start losing cash if that continues. Cowboys play through the middle early when he is on the edge and he’s not getting enough minutes in the middle during his second stint to make up for it. I was planning to play him for the bye and sell R14, but 3 games suddenly seems like a long stretch if he keeps leaning into these 30s.
Snatchpato wrote:Imagine neither owning cook nor grant
robelgordo wrote:I just worked out that if I owned all the players that scored more points than the players I do own, I’d be 1st overall.
Snatchpato wrote:Imagine neither owning cook nor grant
Fucking first world problems owning one of the top 2 hookers in the game my word