NRLFF Survivor Season 2 - Part 2

Round 20 Challenge

Everyone will be partnered up with someone as seen below.

Both pairs must pick a team with no overlapping players between them.
Each team must only have 1 player per team.
Pairs have a $18,000,000 salary cap that includes all starters and reserves
This does not have to be evenly distributed.
Immunity will be rewarded to the player with the most points in the winning pair.
Pick a team of 13 plus a reserve for each position plus a reserve for each position.
If multiple players in the same position are out you will receive the points of whoever plays in the same position for the latest player that pulls out. If multiple players in the same position in the same game pullout you will get whoever fills in for the most expensive player.

Pairs:

Papadontbleach & Cunbert
Jumping Marlin & Chewie
EasyTiger & StuDogg101
B/L & TeethEater

To prevent purposefully tanking. If you submit an ineligible team wether that is because of salary cap, multiple players in the same team or overlapping players with your partner you cannot win immunity for round 21

Ahhh FS, can I get a lot of clarification for this?

So me and papa both submit a team? And we have a combined salary cap of 1.8mil. This is 1.8mil by 26 players + reserves? Not really possibly?
Assuming reserves count to the cap too?

And both our teams are combined for a score as a pair. Then, all pairs are compared and for the winning pair the top scorer of that pair gets immunity? So just 1 immunity?

Page 51

I left off a 0. It was meant to be $18 million

Cunbert wrote:Ahhh FS, can I get a lot of clarification for this?

So me and papa both submit a team? And we have a combined salary cap of 1.8mil. This is 1.8mil by 26 players + reserves? Not really possibly?
Assuming reserves count to the cap too?

And both our teams are combined for a score as a pair. Then, all pairs are compared and for the winning pair the top scorer of that pair gets immunity? So just 1 immunity?

Reserves count to cap.
Its 18 million salary cap.

Your last few lines are correct

@FalconSloth... no captains?

Chewie wrote:@FalconSloth... no captains?

no captains

Cunbert wrote:Yo fellas I just want to say something.

Can we get rid of the comments about how the game is being run? Talk about it amongst yourselves sure, and if there is a decision you don’t agree with it’s fine to ask about it at the time, but there is no need to carry on about things still and make so many comments or not enter teams for challenges or any other passive aggressive response. (Not saying I’m innocent either and not trying to target anyone in particular, just had to use a couple examples I’m sure most have seen).
I’m sure FS is doing the best he can and he is putting a lot of effort in to run the game for us and make it his own version of it. FS should be being thanked not disrespected.

Just sharing my opinions mate as I exit the game.  Also I don't think anyone purposefully has not put teams in for challenges this year.  It is part of the game though, you should have seen some of what went on last year, this year is mild in comparison.

Cunbert wrote:Yo fellas I just want to say something.

Can we get rid of the comments about how the game is being run? Talk about it amongst yourselves sure, and if there is a decision you don’t agree with it’s fine to ask about it at the time, but there is no need to carry on about things still and make so many comments or not enter teams for challenges or any other passive aggressive response. (Not saying I’m innocent either and not trying to target anyone in particular, just had to use a couple examples I’m sure most have seen).
I’m sure FS is doing the best he can and he is putting a lot of effort in to run the game for us and make it his own version of it. FS should be being thanked not disrespected.

Thanks Cunbert. Agreed.

@falconsloth

What do you mean by this?
“Each team must only have 1 player per team”

As in each submitted team must only have 1 player from each nrl team?

There are only 16 nrl teams, and our submission teams are 13 + 6 emergency which is 19?

Cunbert wrote:@falconsloth

What do you mean by this?
“Each team must only have 1 player per team”

As in each submitted team must only have 1 player from each nrl team?

There are only 16 nrl teams, and our submission teams are 13 + 6 emergency which is 19?

I think he refers to the overlapping players.

Chewie wrote:

I think he refers to the overlapping players.

That's what I first thought, but it seems like a separate point to the first point about the overlapping players?

What if we just make sure our 13 don’t have overlaps and ignore the reserves?

I think at this stage everyone just ignore this rule? No limit on players per nrl team?

Cunbert wrote:@falconsloth

What do you mean by this?
“Each team must only have 1 player per team”

As in each submitted team must only have 1 player from each nrl team?

There are only 16 nrl teams, and our submission teams are 13 + 6 emergency which is 19?

Emergencies don't count in the 1 per team rule

I wrote the challenge then added reserves afterward to avoid . I re-considered the salary but forgot to think about the 1 player per NRL team rule.

To clarify:

Maximum 1 player per NRL team in your starting 13
Reserves don't matter. pick anyone as long as you fit in the salary cap

Wow, that changes things... back to the drawing board