NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 52 - Tevita Pangai, Bye Round Captain

Loomer wrote:

Just noticed recently if some one having a personal dig at me 99% likely it's you. Never funny either just low hanging fruit. I may be sarcastic but try not to make personal digs against other posters like some do on here but you carry on.

ShadowSabre wrote:

If it makes you feel better I have gone balls to the wall and I am down to 9 left after 4 this week, with the plan of not using any more (injury aside) until round 17.

Just like all other years this will probably turn to custard, but was the only way I could see making significant rank changes.  Just got to hope for some luck now.

You 12/11 after trades looks much better than my 9 haha

robelgordo wrote:

Cheers, that's how I'm looking at it. Think it's a hold for me.

But for the record, no matter what happens from here the #1 trade I wish I hasn't wasted will be Trent Peoples. Fuck that guy.

toast wrote:I picked up Hammer because I thought it was more useful than a Savage Avo. A wait and see on the correct option (probably not what I picked)

Revraiser wrote:

I've legit got you in my mind as one of the funnier/open posters on the forum. Cant fathom how its a personal dig, but i'll take note if that's how you take my posts.

Revraiser wrote:

This is where the game fails, if this happens u should get someone, anyone as captain. Like last week's captain, auto or the 4th highest scorer this week. Something.

rhinoceroo wrote:

Not sure either of them are great options, but:

Price: Savage cheaper. One point to him.

Break Even: Similar. Half a point each.

Job security: Both probably have to kill it to keep their position after a month vs CNK/Rapana or Dufty/Allan. Who's more likely to? I'd say Savage, but marginal. Half a point each.

Scoring potential: More attacking stats on offer for the Raiders than the Bulldogs. Point to Savage imo.

Positional utility: Depends on team makeup but HLF/CTR probably more useful than WFB. Averillo +1

Savage 3, Averillo 2 (4-1 if you need a WFB)

Snatchpato wrote:
Yep lesson learned there. Though in my defence I didn't realise he wasn't top 30 for Souths, though he was just as fringe guy. Not in my defence though, I should have done the homework.

robelgordo wrote:

Not as many as you haha. 12 before making a 4th. Which is why I'm leaning towards holding him.

wolfking wrote:

That makes it tough then.  You're banking on whichever one you pick keeping a secure role.  Avo probably a better chance of that.

You could keep him and wait on Kennedy.

my tv broke wrote:You should be able to change captains mid round if you dont like your captains score.

Milchcow wrote:

Why  limit it to captain and vice-captain?

We should set a captain, a vice-captain, a vice-vice-captain, a vice-vice-vice-captain, a 5th-choice-starting-to-get-desperate-captain, a sorry-I-really-dropped-the-ball-please-give-me-a-score-captain, a scraping-the-bottom-of-the-barrel-captain, a please-its-the-bye-rounds-and-I-only-have-8-active-players-captain, and a fuck-it-just-double-Edrick-Lee's-negative-score-captain

Would that be enough for you.

Aardvark wrote:I feel like Scrooge Mcduck sitting here with my 15 left post trades....should probably have spent a few more earlier

Aardvark wrote:I feel like Scrooge Mcduck sitting here with my 15 left post trades....should probably have spent a few more earlier

Loomer wrote:

Ok it's probably one post the other week that unnescessarily pissed me off and I've blown it out of proportion. Peace

Aardvark wrote:I feel like Scrooge Mcduck sitting here with my 15 left post trades....should probably have spent a few more earlier

Revraiser wrote:Its so funny, as soon as i read Matts reply, i thought instantly of posting something about not being in the mindset of Matt/Loomer/Beth  You would need a room with a queen size bed if anyone said 'get a room'.

Be more diligent @Chewie, ffs. Use the force or something, ok ??

wolfking wrote:

15 too.  That's after getting a shitto like Avo or Savage in.