His name literally translates to "people man".
People is multiple persons which means he will score multiples of what other persons score.
You gotta know the system to beat it.
NRL Fantasy Fanatics - A place for discussion of NRL Fantasy / Virtual Sports / Super Coach and other Fantasy Sports
filthridden wrote:If you're not bringing in Volkman you're doing it wrong.
His name literally translates to "people man".
People is multiple persons which means he will score multiples of what other persons score.
You gotta know the system to beat it.
sbr202 wrote:
It is a shame that logic didn't fly with Trent
filthridden wrote:If you're not bringing in Volkman you're doing it wrong.
His name literally translates to "people man".
People is multiple persons which means he will score multiples of what other persons score.
You gotta know the system to beat it.
filthridden wrote:
That was "peoples" not "people" - The word peoples is specifically used as the plural of people in its sense as a collective singular noun referring to a nation, or tribe, or other community.
I like to imagine The Trent Peoples would be a nomadic rural community of men all called Trent.
Imagine a caravan consisting of Trent Barrett, Trent Merrin, Trent Hodkinson and every other Trent you know.
It would be a disaster full of VK commodores, tickets to Download festival and meth.
Someone from the Trent Peoples called Trent Peoples was sadly never going to score well.
Jack Torrance wrote:
What have you been smoking today
filthridden wrote:
That was "peoples" not "people" - The word peoples is specifically used as the plural of people in its sense as a collective singular noun referring to a nation, or tribe, or other community.
I like to imagine The Trent Peoples would be a nomadic rural community of men all called Trent.
Imagine a caravan consisting of Trent Barrett, Trent Merrin, Trent Hodkinson and every other Trent you know.
It would be a disaster full of VK commodores, tickets to Download festival and meth.
Someone from the Trent Peoples called Trent Peoples was sadly never going to score well.
my tv broke wrote:
Sometimes you have to ask yourself is it group think or just a couple of posters who post a lot.
I am a poster who posts a lot.
filthridden wrote:If you're not bringing in Volkman you're doing it wrong.
His name literally translates to "people man".
People is multiple persons which means he will score multiples of what other persons score.
You gotta know the system to beat it.
Aardvark wrote:
Every one of my boneheaded decisions/non decisions this year have been the sole responsibility of the bonehead making them.
I would love to blame groupthink but they have definitely been my own work. Maybe each mundane option just gets dissected and disemboweled at great length and breadth on the forum (generally by a few posters, but that's fine) so that it seems like everyone is making the same moves.
What actually happens is most people tune out, shit post and subsequently forget about it until 7.45pm Thursday which leads to a WTF trade....or is that just my mate (as in 'asking for a').
That's why shitposting is important, it prevents the scourge of groupthink (which may or may not exist).
WT2K wrote:Eels dropped Nathan Brown and told him he’s free to leave
https://www.smh.com.au/sport/nrl/eels-drop-nathan-brown-give-him-permission-to-leave-20220616-p5au9a.html
WT2K wrote:Eels dropped Nathan Brown and told him he’s free to leave
https://www.smh.com.au/sport/nrl/eels-drop-nathan-brown-give-him-permission-to-leave-20220616-p5au9a.html
GarethEllisismyDad wrote:
Dolphins, warriors, tigers alert
L-Jimmy wrote:Good to know I'm not the only one into some cans today.
Anyway @Aardvark I'm sorry but you're mistaken. Trent is a relative neologism being a probable portmanteau from the Welsh 'tros' (over) and 'hynt' (way) leading to a literal meaning of 'trespasser'. Tresspasser Peoples should definitionally be unwelcome in your team.
But @filthridden one should also be cautious of players eponymous to Hitler's everyman car - cute Beetle visage of both notwithstanding
mattnz wrote:
He strikes me as the kind of guy that ends up at Warriors.
Expect that there are clubs that would love to pick him up ahead of the deadline.
Could even be a buy, depending on where he ends up and minutes he gets in their rotation. Really cheap at $471k for guy who averaged 55 two seasons ago.