NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 72 - CTR trouble

I have 17 + Walters, with 1 trade to go

Can trade a red dot Barnett up to 634k (Carrigan, Wighton et al) and loop 2 others eg with Cheese and RFM

Can trade a current 17 player worth a bit more (eg MCInnes to DCE, Haas, anyone else to 724k) and just do a RFM/Walters loop

Might also be able to decide after looking at the loop options first eg if I want to play Cheese and RFM, trade a 17 player, if I only want to play 1 of them do the Barnett move (excluding trade options from the first few games)

It’s complicated and I’m almost certain to fuck it up

I have 19 green dots because i am cool

(One is the Palace so he dont count)

robelgordo wrote:I have 17 + Walters, with 1 trade to go

Can trade a red dot Barnett up to 634k (Carrigan, Wighton et al) and loop 2 others eg with Cheese and RFM

Can trade a current 17 player worth a bit more (eg MCInnes to DCE, Haas, anyone else to 724k) and just do a RFM/Walters loop

Might also be able to decide after looking at the loop options first eg if I want to play Cheese and RFM, trade a 17 player, if I only want to play 1 of them do the Barnett move (excluding trade options from the first few games)

It’s complicated and I’m almost certain to fuck it up

I forgot the option where I hold the trade until Sunday waiting for the late outs only for there to be none and suddenly make a shitty last trade of Barnett to someone from the last 4 teams

wolfking wrote:

No, I'd hold the trade and play Pole.

Thank you

robelgordo wrote:

I forgot the option where I hold the trade until Sunday waiting for the late outs only for there to be none and suddenly make a shitty last trade of Barnett to someone from the last 4 teams

This seems like good fun!

14 players for me Onto next year.

Loomer wrote:

Thank you

Thats what I'm here for.

Seriously though, I'm not sure why you wouldn't do something like this, a bit confused.

wolfking wrote:

No, I'd hold the trade and play Pole.

wolfking wrote:

Thats what I'm here for.  

Seriously though, I'm not sure why you wouldn't do something like this, a bit confused.

Trades carry over to next season?

my tv broke wrote:

Trades carry over to next season?

They do?! Bah, I find that out now? I know, I'll login to another account next year, wont play, and in 2024 I have 72 trades!

Papadontbleach wrote:I have 20 green dots and one trade. No idea what to do but I think hold the trade just in case of funny business. I’m definitely a chance at the monthly prize so I could try something but I think I probably need to play it safe.

Anyone got any thoughts?

My team:

Nice team. I’d watch and see what unfolds in case of late outs.
Otherwise I’d consider someone with high ceiling you could loop in.

Whats everyone hoping for this weekend...

For me! I'd like to see the Broncos beat the Dragons 36-10 to take them to an even 0 for and against.

Then, I'd like to see the Tigers get up by scoring three tries in the last 15 minutes to be victorious 28-10 just for the fun of seeing Ricky Stuart cry!

ALSO the Eels to wallop the Storm

The Dolphin Conspiracies wrote:Whats everyone hoping for this weekend...

For me! I'd like to see the Broncos beat the Dragons 36-10 to take them to an even 0 for and against.

Then, I'd like to see the Tigers get up by scoring three tries in the last 15 minutes to be victorious 28-10 just for the fun of seeing Ricky Stuart cry!

ALSO the Eels to wallop the Storm

Hoping the storm beat the Eels so the roosters don't have to play the rabbits in back to back games. Feel like we're more likely to beat the Eels or Raiders (depending on if we win this weekend) in week 1 of the finals.

robelgordo wrote:

I’d probably go with one of the Sharks CTRs, seem like most upside to get an 80.

Notice you have Eisenhuth on the shortlist, which leads me to my left field idea - pick a Panthers forward, as one of them will have a 60-80 game you’d think. Problem is knowing which one.

Yeah I took Eisenhuth as most likely to have a big minute game. Would love to gamble on Lindsay Smith but feels wrong to leave so much in the bank

Think I'll probably go for Ramien

robelgordo wrote:I have 17 + Walters, with 1 trade to go

Can trade a red dot Barnett up to 634k (Carrigan, Wighton et al) and loop 2 others eg with Cheese and RFM

Can trade a current 17 player worth a bit more (eg MCInnes to DCE, Haas, anyone else to 724k) and just do a RFM/Walters loop

Might also be able to decide after looking at the loop options first eg if I want to play Cheese and RFM, trade a 17 player, if I only want to play 1 of them do the Barnett move (excluding trade options from the first few games)

It’s complicated and I’m almost certain to fuck it up

I'd trade red dot Barnett. Gives you an extra number in case of a late out and probably beefs up the 17 a little

Who wins this matchup:

A: Ofa, Ming, Butcher, Manu, Walsh, Robson, RFM
B: Bird, Moses, Haas, JPap, Fifita, Lolo, Mahoney/Koula (loop)

multiple.scoregasms wrote:

I'd trade red dot Barnett. Gives you an extra number in case of a late out and probably beefs up the 17 a little

You'd have to make sure he's got cover across the park first. No point doing that if a position without cover is a late out and the trade is useless.

Thanks MS and Wolfie for the advice

Ive got reasonable cover, at least one player for every position. Obviously that may not be enough depending how stuff pans out

Current thinking is if I pencil in Barnett to *someone 634k who plays reasonably late* I can figure out a double loop option as well as switch the trade if something happens

Weird to have to do stuff after 3 weeks of basically not touching the team

wolfking wrote:

Thats what I'm here for.  

Seriously though, I'm not sure why you wouldn't do something like this, a bit confused.

The Q was is Tino a good trade in really. As using Pole I think I will do Pole to Tapine as both last game and can cover any shenanigans like unexpected player cuts that effects me playing 17 position wise

Loomer wrote:

The Q was is Tino a good trade in really.

Ask again on Saturday around 5pm AEST