GarethEllisismyDad wrote:
despite being walshes biggest cheerleader prolly turbo,
but if you need the money elsewhere walsh is a decent understudy
and I have guaranteed a ton, in the next 5 fixtures, one down
Thought I was
NRL Fantasy Fanatics - A place for discussion of NRL Fantasy / Virtual Sports / Super Coach and other Fantasy Sports
GarethEllisismyDad wrote:
despite being walshes biggest cheerleader prolly turbo,
but if you need the money elsewhere walsh is a decent understudy
and I have guaranteed a ton, in the next 5 fixtures, one down
Milchcow wrote:
608/13c
Trindall, Doueihi, Alamoti, Preston to go
Seems pretty poor really
mattnz wrote:
He was at the only club where the expectation of every outside back was that they run the ball back constantly and take a hit up every set, which is what Kiraz is now doing.
It seems that Walters either doesn't require that of his backs, or Walsh isn't capable of it.
Aardvark Ratnick wrote:
Thought I was
superbucks wrote:Not having EKatoa is kind of a problem.
554/11+C.
wolfking wrote:
I could have sworn you were all over trading Walsh in last week until Kiraz ended up with a monster score.
Anyway, not sure why you're so pig headed on Walsh, just don't trade him in then bro if you don't think he's fantasy relevant and move on. If others want to trade him in, good luck to them.
Aardvark Ratnick wrote:
Thought I was
mattnz wrote:
I was keen on Walsh, until I started looking at the stats, rather than the eye test.
mattnz wrote:
This is the biggest load of shit you have posted here. Check out my team tracker if you want the truth on Kiraz and his base stats.
The guy is taking 20+ hit ups a game like Edwards does, when he gets a couple of tries he scores 90, not 52.
In round 1, when his team got thumped and he went off for an HIA, he still scored 48, with 0 attacking chances. Without the HIA he beats the Walsh score this week.
Has a career average of 2.5 offloads and has increased his work rate coming out of his own end to what his coach was getting out of Panthers backs like Edwards, Too and May.
GarethEllisismyDad wrote:
i have his poster on the wall, and there may or may not be lipstick markes, your serve
mattnz wrote:
He was at the only club where the expectation of every outside back was that they run the ball back constantly and take a hit up every set, which is what Kiraz is now doing.
It seems that Walters either doesn't require that of his backs, or Walsh isn't capable of it.
mattnz wrote:
I was keen on Walsh, until I started looking at the stats, rather than the eye test.
mattnz wrote:
I was keen on Walsh, until I started looking at the stats, rather than the eye test.
Contrastinghobby wrote:
Are you arguing for or against base stats, I am so confused?
No need to get rude and angry about it
My point stands that they both rely on attacking stats and there is nothing wrong with that
I said your Kiraz pick was good and the only reason I can think why you are so angry now is you don't own him and he scored junk points in the end to save his score
I wish I could choose a team that could score 1200 one week then 700 the next. It would be exciting
Yes it's frustrating but no reason to be a dick about it
You are more risk averse than most and your team is hardly made up of plodding JTrbo/Twal players
Boom bust , you win some weeks and lose some
Now say something nice to average out your comments
mattnz wrote:
You can remain confused, simple logic seems to fail you. No need to keep trolling and being a dick.
Aardvark Ratnick wrote:I have had no interest in Tyrell Sloan but 2 scores of 40+ he maybe my Tommy Talau out.