NRL Fantasy 2023 Part 32 - All trade in's must have a full set of teeth

I got lucky with Katoa in at 14. Niko 25 is first cab of the rank for a loop. Followed by Warbrick, Sloan and Hands.

A likeable word in itself.


Heritage I mean.

Teddy good to go

Both 1-17 except for Hunt benched and Kaufusi starting

filling in time, been a while since i've tried to use photoshop

Holy Moly wrote:

Are there any English words that capture this sense?

mattnz wrote:

Maybe heritage.

Heritage is a good one. Ancestry. But the beauty of it is that it digs even deeper, in a sense that I can't think of an English equivalent.

Camo123 wrote:Teddy good to go

Both 1-17 except for Hunt benched and Kaufusi starting

Have updated team news accordingly

Having Teddy and Cheese locked and loaded, but in the unlikely event Hosking is axed at 530 cut, might have to PANIC

Finucane and Rudolf big outs for the Sharks.
Roosters 1-12 and Teddy goes close to joining Munster and Cleary at the top of the page.

Extra mini cleary for the lols

my tv broke wrote:filling in time, been a while since i've tried to use photoshop

Haha that background faded text though - quality

Nothing has happened over the last 24 hours to make Hopgood a hold?

Talented crew here

All the banners are cool, I'd like to see any of them "win"

Can we have a GIF as a banner?

Who we all got tonight? This weekends gam seem really close on paper

I went Roosters and Storm

Liverpool_Bulldog wrote:Nothing has happened over the last 24 hours to make Hopgood a hold?

I hope not. I don't ever recall feeling as filthy as I do about making the trade, but far as I can assess it's wise to part ways. Regrettably.

Chewie wrote:Talented crew here

Agreed. I spend 99% of my spare time in Photoshop and couldn't even imagine how to do a banner like what's being presented. Very nice.

Teeth Eater wrote:

I hope not. I don't ever recall feeling as filthy as I do about making the trade, but far as I can assess it's wise to part ways. Regrettably.



Agreed. I spend 99% of my spare time in Photoshop and couldn't even imagine how to do a banner like what's being presented. Very nice.

Canva man... easy peasy. It honestly puts Photoshop to shame in terms of usability. Of course Photoshop the gold standard for skilled users but for mouthbreathers like me Canva is a godsend.

Finch wrote:Who we all got tonight? This weekends gam seem really close on paper

I went Roosters and Storm

I've gone Sharks (and Storm, probably more obviously). I was really surprised when making my tips to see Roosters were such strong favourites. Hadn't factored in the missing forwards for the Sharks, though. Guess that makes a significant impact. But the Roosters did play like they did last week...

Snatchpato wrote:
Canva man... easy peasy. It honestly puts Photoshop to shame in terms of usability. Of course Photoshop the gold standard for skilled users but for mouthbreathers like me Canva is a godsend.

lol. Good for photo editing, or just this fancy kind of graphic design type of stuff? Do you call that graphic designs type of stuff, or something else?

Never heard of Canva... I'll check it.

Snatchpato wrote:
Canva man... easy peasy. It honestly puts Photoshop to shame in terms of usability. Of course Photoshop the gold standard for skilled users but for mouthbreathers like me Canva is a godsend.

I did mine in Powerpoint (very old school)

Although I don't get the fat fingered hate. It was not a serious suggestion. Much like my team.

Teeth Eater wrote:

lol. Good for photo editing, or just this fancy kind of graphic design type of stuff? Do you call that graphic designs type of stuff, or something else?

Never heard of Canva... I'll check it.

I guess this is graphic design. It's really good for people who don't want to invest time into photoshop, but do want easy tools like background removal, blur, editing contrast etc. 

Not sure it would be as good for photo editing, but it does allow you to control tint, contrast, saturation, vibrance, highlights, lowlights etc etc. Should be good enough for basic edits, but probably not if you want a lot of control.