NRL Fantasy 2023 Part 78 - Everyone is totally, absolutely, 100% alive

mattnz wrote:

And they just signed another center to play out of position at fullback.

Who'd they sign? I must have missed the news.

mattnz wrote:

And they just signed another center to play out of position at fullback.

You see Matthew, some teams just don’t get football

Snatchpato wrote:
Who'd they sign? I must have missed the news.

Think he meant Critta

They also signed Taaffe and Xerri

Averillo is quick tho

Snatchpato wrote:
Who'd they sign? I must have missed the news.

Crichton is the Bulldogs fullback next season.

Just for the absurdity of it, i was hoping that was going to be be a Knights try reversed into a Bulldogs try

that was at least a knock-on from Preston
shouldn't be a try

Chewie wrote:that was at least a knock-on from Preston
shouldn't be a try

Shouldn't be a try to the Dogs? The Knights try is fine with play on activated.

Chewie wrote:that was at least a knock-on from Preston
shouldn't be a try

Fair play to the bunker on that one I think they got it exactly right. Don't know what the Fox commentators were on about trying to say Preston scored it was the clearest knock on ever. Crossland might get a try save for any owners too.

syn13 wrote:Just for the absurdity of it, i was hoping that was going to be be a Knights try reversed into a Bulldogs try

There was one last year with Brooks and Tom Burgess in golden point

Chewie wrote:that was at least a knock-on from Preston
shouldn't be a try

Only a knock on by Knights would have negated the advantage to Knights after the Preston knock on.

Play should only stop if the team that knocks on regathers the ball, but often referees don't play the advantage.

Have also noticed that this season, it is very rare for players to be allowed a quick tap for a penalty which used to be pretty common.

Ok - so I have a betting question which can't wait ....

I did a couple of doubles, Storm to win 41-50 (done) with either Knights by 41-50 or 50+

Currently 30-0 up at the half but the Bulldogs lost 2 men for 10 minutes each.

Winnings would be $2,447 or $5,642

They are offering me $1,021 and $643 cash out ..... do I take them both .... take one .... leave them?

Big half from Kiraz pls

Ozymandias wrote:Ok - so I have a betting question which can't wait ....

I did a couple of doubles, Storm to win 41-50 (done) with either Knights by 41-50 or 50+

Currently 30-0 up at the half but the Bulldogs lost 2 men for 10 minutes each.

Winnings would be $2,447 or $5,642

They are offering me $1,021 and $643 cash out ..... do I take them both .... take one .... leave them?

I would probably take the 1021 and the let the second one ride

Assuming those are posted in order (ie 1021 cash out or win 2447)

But, im likely wrong so you do you!

Wonder if Taaffe will end up first choice fullback over Crichton

my tv broke wrote:

I would probably take the 1021 and the let the second one ride

Assuming those are posted in order (ie 1021 cash out or win 2447)

No - sorry, the larger amount is for the 51+ ... I'd be taking the 643 and hoping they win by 51

Ozymandias wrote:

No - sorry, the larger amount is for the 51+ ... I'd be taking the 643 and hoping they win by 51

Yeah id do that

my tv broke wrote:

I would probably take the 1021 and the let the second one ride

Assuming those are posted in order (ie 1021 cash out or win 2447)

But, im likely wrong so you do you!

Yeah I was thinking the same.

Very much a personal decision though, appetite for risk etc

precursor wrote:Wonder if Taaffe will end up first choice fullback over Crichton

I personally think he should, but Crichton was sold the opportunity based on playing fullback, that he couldn't be at Panthers and he is being paid fullback salary.

A Bulldogs edge of Kikau, Crichton, JAC would be pretty good, they would just need enough quality ball.