NRL Fantasy 2024 Part 10 - Not enough Raiders

WT Winfield wrote:

I'm at 6 MIDs, but no gun, so if you're at 7 then it might be overkill.

Wong seems like a hold. Sitili and Piakura annoying with the stalled cash gen. Piakura pretty safe JS and hard to replace without spending up, so probably have to play it like Ford last year with the Rd 2 HIA and standown. If Sitili's out, I'll probably punt him for May, but hold if he's right. Ended up skipping Hopgood to take a big enough bank to upgrade anyone to May or whoever shinier shows up next week.

Suli was pretty much the cheapest CTR I could find with JS and averaged over 30 in the past

lukeayee wrote:

You are missing my point. I highlighted three other groups who could be potentially pissed off with a slight modification in language. Yet I'd hazard a guess no men currently with soft cocks were offended, and neither were men in skirts.

Women who tackle hard, know they can tackle hard. Men who tackle hard know they can tackle hard.

Charterising women for being femine is not sexist, nor is charaterising men with more feminine attributes.

Was it rabbits intention to belittle women? I doubt it.

You have the choice to be offended or be confident in the fact you are a better person.

I didn't make the comment, and I also didn't highlight its potential offensive nature. I think everyone should just harden the F up.

Snatchpato wrote:McInnes, (C)leary, and Papy playing tonight. Not many players but guns all round. Here's hoping they perform as expected!

Anyone got any PODs I can life-ride with you tonight? May, RTS, Tuaupiki, Tohu?

I know plenty will have Grant and Chan (probably EMG).

lukeayee wrote:

You are missing my point. I highlighted three other groups who could be potentially pissed off with a slight modification in language. Yet I'd hazard a guess no men currently with soft cocks were offended, and neither were men in skirts.

Women who tackle hard, know they can tackle hard. Men who tackle hard know they can tackle hard.

Charterising women for being femine is not sexist, nor is charaterising men with more feminine attributes.

Was it rabbits intention to belittle women? I doubt it.

You have the choice to be offended or be confident in the fact you are a better person.

I didn't make the comment, and I also didn't highlight its potential offensive nature. I think everyone should just harden the F up.

Daedalus wrote:

Currently have Montoya in my back 3 as a POD

rhinoceroo wrote:

I note that three-time premiership winning  Clive Churchill medallist Dylan Edwards is playing NRL today.

my tv broke wrote:Finally getting to a point where there isn't much tinkering left available.

Main question is still whether to Kini at WFB3 and if Luki stays or becomes someone in that ballpark range. Can only assume Salmon will start at 13 as named.

220k in the bank to flip around, but i did want to keep a little on hand.

Alternatives to Kini are Tuaupiki and Niu. Both cost a bit more and have their own problems.

If i stick with Kini, I could actually spend all my bank and get McInnes or equivalent price range.. which is mighty tempting but could hurt in a week or two

Daedalus wrote:

Currently have Montoya in my back 3 as a POD

lukeayee wrote:

You are missing my point. I highlighted three other groups who could be potentially pissed off with a slight modification in language. Yet I'd hazard a guess no men currently with soft cocks were offended, and neither were men in skirts.

Women who tackle hard, know they can tackle hard. Men who tackle hard know they can tackle hard.

Charterising women for being femine is not sexist, nor is charaterising men with more feminine attributes.

Was it rabbits intention to belittle women? I doubt it.

You have the choice to be offended or be confident in the fact you are a better person.

I didn't make the comment, and I also didn't highlight its potential offensive nature. I think everyone should just harden the F up.

Snatchpato wrote:
Love it, adding him to the list!

lukeayee wrote:

Women who tackle hard, know they can tackle hard. Men who tackle hard know they can tackle hard.

Charterising women for being femine is not sexist, nor is charaterising men with more feminine attributes.

Was it rabbits intention to belittle women? I doubt it.

You have the choice to be offended or be confident in the fact you are a better person.

I didn't make the comment, and I also didn't highlight its potential offensive nature. I think everyone should just harden the F up.

easytiger wrote:

I mean I guess you can choose to be obtuse if that makes you happy.
But I think you know that it perpetuates a stereotype that is both demeaning and completely unnecesary.

I also think you know that intention seldom weakens harm - there's a pretty topical case this week where the perpetrator has said it wasn't their intention for example...

Goodnight Kiwi wrote:Those in the same position, you playing Levi’s 31 or giving Chan on debut a run at starting 2RF against the Panthers?

Goodnight Kiwi wrote:Those in the same position, you playing Levi’s 31 or giving Chan on debut a run at starting 2RF against the Panthers?

easytiger wrote:

Well that's an interesting way to mark international women's day.

Maybe next time before you use "girls" as some sort of negative floor for performance, you think about what would happen if you tried to run around Georgia Hale in a game, or maybe tried to tackle Mele Hufanga, Millie Boyle or Isabelle Kelly just as a few examples.