multiple.scoregasms wrote:
Any love for Mahoney? One of these days he isn't gonna miss 10 tackles right?
But for real though he seems destined to be a low 40's scorer until/if the Bulldogs ever notably improve.
NRL Fantasy Fanatics - A place for discussion of NRL Fantasy / Virtual Sports / Super Coach and other Fantasy Sports
multiple.scoregasms wrote:
Any love for Mahoney? One of these days he isn't gonna miss 10 tackles right?
Rabbit wrote:AL wrote:
The lunatics were indeed running the asylum briefly. Was funny times.
I applied for the job with the head bloke in Melbourne, forget his name, he gave me the gig and I proceeded to ban everyone I didn't like much or argued with. Normally just for a few hours, but Pie Eater copped it. lol.
Putin's got nothing.
Hannah2 wrote:So which Bronco's player benefits from Haas' minutes?
OB wrote:
I would say Willison comes in and Hetherington and/or Baker probably get some more time. Don't see them changing Taupau's role that much as an impact forward.
The Dolphin Conspiracies wrote:Rabbit wrote:
Yeah, but then you need to know the name of the team. Takes a bit of research sometimes, lol. You can just scroll down the fog to find someone here and guess their team.
Interesting observation, the only person that doesn't have any name with their team is the very elusive and secretive "Dolphin Conspiracies".
I'd say he's on a witness protection program, hiding from the cops, an ex boyfriend or drug cartels. Possibly all 4.
This has been covered many times on the forum...
My name is Standard Issue, I like long walks on the beach and I get jealous when Stew gets more attention than me
Makes Carrigan temptingHannah2 wrote:So which Bronco's player benefits from Haas' minutes?
THEGAME wrote:Any love for Xavier Willison ?
standard-issue wrote:
Speaking of super mods-how are you travelling KFP?
Honeysett wrote:Rabbit wrote:AL wrote:
The lunatics were indeed running the asylum briefly. Was funny times.
I applied for the job with the head bloke in Melbourne, forget his name, he gave me the gig and I proceeded to ban everyone I didn't like much or argued with. Normally just for a few hours, but Pie Eater copped it. lol.
Putin's got nothing.
It was a lawless state in those times.
It does, wonder what his average would is without Haas playing?mattnz wrote:
Makes Carrigan tempting
ytsb wrote:Cannot decide between Curran and Lussick.... Have skipped both dogs games but in my mind he's gotta be playing 60 for dogs to be the best they can be. Lussick's score last week heavily padded by a try and lba, and looks like he got a 40/20 week 1. I see Curran as a 50 scorer and think Lussick can be bolted on for a 40, probably averages high 40s in 80 mins?
Shady2K wrote:
Well that changes things massively
Nicho time
kamikamicameleons wrote:
2021Grouse wrote:
It does, wonder what his average would is without Haas playing?
Bethany_B wrote:Haas being out this week has actually opened the door for a perfect loop (which is nice because I have to play most of my shittos this week so need all the help I can get)
My team is as follows
Cheese
Haas, Tupouniua, T May
Hopgood, Salmon
Cleary, Flanagan
Strange, Burbo
Papy, Turbo, RTS
Lussick
Galvin
Piakura
Chan
Levi
Hughes
Kris
Bostock
If I do nothing, then Hughes will loop into Haas's spot as the only MID on the bench.
If Levi scores more than Hughes (I can wait until after they both play), I can simply swap Chan and Hopgood, which would place Hopgood on the bench, meaning he gets put into Haas's spot and Levi shifts up ahead of Hughes into the INT.
This is after trading Wong and Luki to Galvin and Lussick.