NRL Fantasy 2024 Part 17 - He haas a sore knee

SoylentGreen wrote:

I might not agree with a lot of what you say Rabs, but I'm 100% on board with this.

As with another misused nautical idiom "jibe with" (not "jive with")

plus other annoyances like "gets on my goat", "chomping at the bit", "deep-seeded", "one in the same", "hunger pains", "mute point", "peaked my interest"

and last but not least, "could care less"

Shady2K wrote:

WOW no Haas?

Spectre wrote:Need to choose one of Curran, Lussick, Galvin and Cotter to bring in this week (other trade in is Fogarty). Who is the priority in terms of price gains? Mind you, I could really use an injection of points at the same time

my tv broke wrote:2367 teams have the Cook/Haas/Wong trifecta.
395 teams have Cook/Haas/Luki.
154 teams unlucky enough to have all four.
8 teams have all four... plus Seyfarth.

BaldShitTruck wrote:

My wife uses the term "mose well"

Snatchpato wrote:If I could only get one, it’d be Turbo over Ted

WT Winfield wrote:Yeah, but you tip against the Roosters every week. Like, every week.

Boozecluez wrote:

Not many if any

SoylentGreen wrote:

I might not agree with a lot of what you say Rabs, but I'm 100% on board with this.

As with another misused nautical idiom "jibe with" (not "jive with")

plus other annoyances like "gets on my goat", "chomping at the bit", "deep-seeded", "one in the same", "hunger pains", "mute point", "peaked my interest"

and last but not least, "could care less"

my tv broke wrote:

willison.. it was only last week i thought i'd seen the worst trade of the season

Milchcow wrote:

Papenhuyzen has the bye next week, so if you don't trade a WFB in this week, what is your plan for next week

Are you relying on Talau and Kris both being back to field a team?

I would bet trading in a WFB gets you better scores than trading in someone else and copping a 0 and maybe Talau for the next 2 weeks.

SoylentGreen wrote:

I might not agree with a lot of what you say Rabs, but I'm 100% on board with this.

As with another misused nautical idiom "jibe with" (not "jive with")

plus other annoyances like "gets on my goat", "chomping at the bit", "deep-seeded", "one in the same", "hunger pains", "mute point", "peaked my interest"

and last but not least, "could care less"

BaldShitTruck wrote:

Was that...Scribe?

my tv broke wrote:Actually stuck on my second out.

Wong to Fine is a goer.
Probably leaning to Lussick as second in.

Outs:-
Hosking - probably has to stay another week and hope for the best.
Hutch - probably survives.
Tups - he does have potential for a decent score..
Rapana or Kiraz - my back five is at surplus.. i've got TMay/Burbo+Paps/Raps/Trbo, and Kiraz on bench, + Strange emgs. Strange can cover Paps bye next week..

I also have Salmon and Levi hanging around..

I should punt one of Kiraz and Rapana, yeah .. ? Fucking Kiraz probably... although I think Rapana has saved his score twice and hasn't looked good though..

Boozecluez wrote:

Correct

BaldShitTruck wrote:

I don't know anyone who rolls like this

multiple.scoregasms wrote:

I hole-hardedly agree, but allow me to play doubles advocate here for a moment. For all intensive purposes I think you are wrong. In an age where false morals are a diamond dozen, true virtues are a blessing in the skies. We often put our false morality on a petal stool like a bunch of pre-Madonnas, but you all seem to be taking something very valuable for granite. So I ask of you to mustard up all the strength you can because it is a doggy dog world out there. Although there is some merit to what you are saying it seems like you have a huge ship on your shoulder. In your argument you seem to throw everything in but the kids Nsync, and even though you are having a feel day with this I am here to bring you back into reality. I have a sick sense when it comes to these types of things. It is almost spooky, because I cannot turn a blonde eye to these glaring flaws in your rhetoric. I have zero taller ants when it comes to people spouting out hate in the name of moral righteousness. You just need to remember what comes around is all around, and when supply and command fails you will be the first to go. Make my words, when you get down to brass stacks it doesn't take rocket appliances to get two birds stoned at once. It's clear who makes the pants in this relationship, and sometimes you just have to swallow your prize and accept the facts. You might have to come to this conclusion through denial and error but I swear on my mother's mating name that when you put the petal to the medal you will pass with flying carpets like it’s a peach of cake.

Boozecluez wrote:

I don't know anybody

BaldShitTruck wrote:

Do you think he asked Ricky to please give it up for Savage?