NRL Fantasy 2024 Part 35 - TerMAYnation time

lubedragon wrote:Is it jumping the gun unloading strange and salmon? or could it put you ahead of the pack next week.

I hope it’s the latter as I got rid of both (and May) this week. I’ve never before sold a player named to start against the Tigers!

Helping Souths Out - Brad Abbey is still playing in Ron Massey Cup, so is Hymel Hunt. Train and trial contracts for both, backline sorted.

No players in last night’s game and I’ve only dropped 1800 places. I had Captain Cleary all set to go last night, just imagine how many points he would have got against the spooners, but fortunately I only traded him in on Monday so he became Garrick instead.

Rabbits21 wrote:

Bit over cautious of Murray to keep his mouthguard in for meeting the fans after the match.

Cake Tiger wrote:

Bit over cautious of Murray to keep his mouthguard in for meeting the fans after the match.

You've got to be joking right ? Souffs fans don't have teeth, they'll pull those fuckers right out of your mouth and glue them in their own

Aardvark wrote:Just sorting out my daughter's team for the round

Me : you should get Reuben Garrick in, great player good breakeven etc etc

Her : have I got enough money for Reece Walsh?

Me : yes but SOO peak price etc etc

Her : yes, yes.....get Reece Walsh

it's the eye lashes!

Is it safe to plan your future trades by just using the Souths draw? 1 trade per week should be enough.
Round 9 should have been Cleary
Round 10 Lomax
Round 11 Drinkwater
Round 12 Talagi
Round 14 Fifita
Round 15 Walsh
Round 16 Garrick
Round 18 Moses
Round 19 Plath
Round 20 Seyfarth

Watson only temporary in the 13 right ? Radley back soon

Chewie wrote:

it's the eye lashes!

Ironically she is sitting at around 15k rank having set up a team after the Las vegas games had been played, only picking players she likes or has seen play (e.g. Mahoney & Kikau), refusing to trade out the Chin, not paying any attention to averages or breakevens when making trade decisions (i.e. extreme fun approach) & generally not caring how she goes.

She would have got Carrigan or Haas over Reece if she had enough money but she did need a WFB.

Revraiser wrote:Watson only temporary in the 13 right ? Radley back soon

Apparently going to be used in the second row?

Liverpool_Bulldog wrote:
Apparently going to be used in the second row?

Who ?

Cake Tiger wrote:

Bit over cautious of Murray to keep his mouthguard in for meeting the fans after the match.

He would have been a bit concerned that Rabs may have tried to slip the tongue in.

Given that shitty crowd last night it's no real surprise the Broncs get most of the Thursday night games....it looked like an A league game on a Tuesday night

Aardvark wrote:

Ironically she is sitting at around 15k rank having set up a team after the Las vegas games had been played, only picking players she likes or has seen play (e.g. Mahoney & Kikau), refusing to trade out the Chin, not paying any attention to averages or breakevens when making trade decisions (i.e. extreme fun approach) & generally not caring how she goes.

She would have got Carrigan or Haas over Reece if she had enough money but she did need a WFB.

On behalf of everyone with a sub-15k rank, this is just hurtful

To think they told us to stick to our process... to hell with the process

Revraiser wrote:

Who ?

Yileen Gordon I think

easytiger wrote:

On behalf of everyone with a sub-15k rank, this is just hurtful

To think they told us to stick to our process... to hell with the process

She'll be in trouble when the byes hit

Revraiser wrote:

Who ?

Radley. Did I read that here yesterday?

multiple.scoregasms wrote:

Bit of a wind up complaining about blokes who have never played first grade missing from first grade. Might need to add in the SG Ball and Jersey Flegg injuries as well

I must admit that when I read through that list of unavailable players, I only spotted two first graders... (that Centre that's generally thought to be better than Lomax, and the winger they prioritised over keeping Adam Reynolds).

Still, the Bunnies should be able to get an exemption to select players outside their roster/development players list, and don't they have a NSW cup winning feeder team?

Aardvark wrote:

She'll be in trouble when the byes hit

But the bye-round planning is why we play, isn't it?  







*Maybe that's just me

Rabs was complaining about The Panthers opening try (fair enough) but the touchie has so much to do so easy to miss a pass that forward, but no complaints about Souths opening try?