by Aardvark Mon Aug 12, 2024 9:22 am
Just on the Plath trade out, context is everything. My instinct was to hold Plath but I made a number of trades that week to 'upgrade' my team. The primary trade was to bring in Cleary and the choice came down to holding Weekes or holding Plath.
My gut was telling me to hold Plath (pretty sure I even said it on here) but I had plenty of MID/HLF cover and sweet fuck all WFB cover I could rely on with Garrick out the next round. I thought it would be more productive to be able to loop Weekes and Gray rather than just play Gray.
It wasn't, Plath went well and I was wrong. The trade had not much to do with Plath's bad scores (i.e. I've held Nikora through a worse run for a reasonable average) and a lot to do with trying to achieve 'balanced team coverage'. As it turned out, holding him would have been the best option.
@Finch is right, sometimes you make a call for the right reasons and it just doesn't work out.
@milchcow is right too, people spunk too many trades on reactive trades when the norm is usually the players average.
Swapped Weekes to Ponga the last round incidentally