HomeOz Sport Mad wrote:
Mate the mining boom is over and by the time a Perth team is back on the radar it will be cheaper than living in Ipswich.
Could you please tell that to the $13 pints I buy, I'd love for Perth to be cheaper.
Salary Cap Change
Honeysett- Moderator
- Posts : 8950
Reputation : 6471
Join date : 2015-09-28
Could you please tell that to the $13 pints I buy, I'd love for Perth to be cheaper.
ryno_- NRL FF Survivor Champion : 2018
Posts : 2230
Reputation : 490
Join date : 2015-09-27
Age : 35
Honeysett wrote:
Could you please tell that to the $13 pints I buy, I'd love for Perth to be cheaper.
Amen sista.
Honeysett wrote:
The Valley (not comparing just making a point) is one of the biggest shitholes I've ever seen.
Testify!
Pieman- Posts : 3553
Reputation : 386
Join date : 2015-10-26
Team should have to have used up their entire salary cap before they dip into 3rd party agreements.
For example - they carried on about how the signing of James Roberts actually helped the broncos cap - I guess because he signed for less cap money and more TPA money.
For example - they carried on about how the signing of James Roberts actually helped the broncos cap - I guess because he signed for less cap money and more TPA money.
No Worries- Moderator
- NRL FF Survivor Champion : I'm like the waterboy.
Posts : 10527
Reputation : 7277
Join date : 2015-07-31
Pieman wrote:Team should have to have used up their entire salary cap before they dip into 3rd party agreements.
For example - they carried on about how the signing of James Roberts actually helped the broncos cap - I guess because he signed for less cap money and more TPA money.
In theory it sounds common sense and agreeable. But in practice wouldn't be realistic. Club X (see what I did there) has exhausted it's salary cap and dipped into 3rd parties to top up 6 players earnings. A player on $450K retires and I replace him with a $300K player. I'm now $150K under the cap and have 6 players on TPA's illegally. Do I then have to renegotiate 1 players contract to put an extra $150K cap money into his salary and then trust that his manager (because as a club I have nothing to do with TPA's) hands back $150K to the third party. What if all 6 blokes said no to the renegotiation ?
B/L- Posts : 3395
Reputation : 2796
Join date : 2016-01-12
TPA's are an absolute joke, I know my club benefits from them. But I just cant take the salary cap seriously with the way the system is currently.
Pieman- Posts : 3553
Reputation : 386
Join date : 2015-10-26
Im sure there are many many holes in it, was just a thought.Your Name wrote:
In theory it sounds common sense and agreeable. But in practice wouldn't be realistic. Club X (see what I did there) has exhausted it's salary cap and dipped into 3rd parties to top up 6 players earnings. A player on $450K retires and I replace him with a $300K player. I'm now $150K under the cap and have 6 players on TPA's illegally. Do I then have to renegotiate 1 players contract to put an extra $150K cap money into his salary and then trust that his manager (because as a club I have nothing to do with TPA's) hands back $150K to the third party. What if all 6 blokes said no to the renegotiation ?
Then the club shouldnt be allowed to sign anyone else until its all sorted or something like that. There would be a way around it. But yeah, tricky.
The amount of money a player is on from a TPA is (or should be) irrelevant because as you said, the club is suppose to have nothing to do with it.