2016 NRL.com Fantasy Thread Part 34
Revraiser- Fanatic
- Posts : 17155
Reputation : 9482
Join date : 2015-10-21
Location : Sydney
- Post n°21
Re: 2016 NRL.com Fantasy Thread Part 34
What happened to the Fisherman?
filthridden- Moderator
- Posts : 19240
Reputation : 12118
Join date : 2015-09-27
- Post n°22
Re: 2016 NRL.com Fantasy Thread Part 34
Taylor! Tackle break, line break and try. Thank you very much!
Milchcow- Moderator
- Posts : 25406
Reputation : 17829
Join date : 2015-07-31
- Post n°23
Re: 2016 NRL.com Fantasy Thread Part 34
In the 58th minute, Mansour scored a try to take him to 30 points.
15 minutes later , he has reached the magnificent heights of ... 30 points
filthridden- Moderator
- Posts : 19240
Reputation : 12118
Join date : 2015-09-27
- Post n°24
Re: 2016 NRL.com Fantasy Thread Part 34
Just add a couple of points for the goal while we're there.
Something finally going OK for me this weekend!
Something finally going OK for me this weekend!
filthridden- Moderator
- Posts : 19240
Reputation : 12118
Join date : 2015-09-27
- Post n°25
Re: 2016 NRL.com Fantasy Thread Part 34
TAYLOOOOOOORRRRR
EvenSteeden- Posts : 365
Reputation : 43
Join date : 2015-10-30
Location : NZ
- Post n°26
Re: 2016 NRL.com Fantasy Thread Part 34
EvenSteeden wrote:Anthony Don must be one of the worst 'DT' players of this modern era...in addition he hasn't score a try since r1
Sorry Panthers fans that was my bad
Revraiser- Fanatic
- Posts : 17155
Reputation : 9482
Join date : 2015-10-21
Location : Sydney
- Post n°27
Re: 2016 NRL.com Fantasy Thread Part 34
Is Don !
filthridden- Moderator
- Posts : 19240
Reputation : 12118
Join date : 2015-09-27
- Post n°28
Re: 2016 NRL.com Fantasy Thread Part 34
If I was a bouncer there is no fucking way I would let Ashley Taylor in. Kid looks about 13.
sets- Posts : 924
Reputation : 503
Join date : 2016-01-27
- Post n°29
Re: 2016 NRL.com Fantasy Thread Part 34
titans seem way better without Tyrone.
Guest- Guest
- Post n°30
Re: 2016 NRL.com Fantasy Thread Part 34
Bren wrote:
So he has more NRL games under his belt then Guerra or Aubs hey? I said run with the most experience as possible. Matterson was in the squad for rounds 8,9 and 10 so he wasn't promoted for this game like you suggest unlike Watson who was in the squad for rounds 7 and 8.
I'm just so confused at this post Bren. My point is that for the winger spot wouldn't it be better to play a winger like Elliot on the wing and leave your centres as named?
I seriously don't know what playing more games has to do with it? But if you want to look at it like that Elliot has played more first grade games than Matterson and Watson put together and Slaimankhel has played more first grade than Watson and Matterson
Guest- Guest
- Post n°31
Re: 2016 NRL.com Fantasy Thread Part 34
Mighty Fishes wrote:
I'm just so confused at this post Bren. My point is that for the winger spot wouldn't it be better to play a winger like Elliot on the wing and leave your centres as named?
I seriously don't know what playing more games has to do with it? But if you want to look at it like that Elliot has played more first grade games than Matterson and Watson put together and Slaimankhel has played more first grade than Watson and Matterson
My point is that I am trying to come up with a reason why the coach would do such a thing. I think you missed that point. Do you have a better explanation as to why he would do such a thing, if so I would love to hear it? Even Gus Gould is baffled as to the lineup.
Guest- Guest
- Post n°32
Re: 2016 NRL.com Fantasy Thread Part 34
well the rest of my week has been shithouse, but Hastings playing left-right-out meant i put the R on Taylor, i'll gladly accept that complete fluke.
Guest- Guest
- Post n°33
Re: 2016 NRL.com Fantasy Thread Part 34
Revraiser wrote:What happened to the Fisherman?
Well when Soward took that first kick at goal they mentioned that he came to the side lines because he dislocated his thumb and they put it back into place and carried on. Maybe that might have something to do with it
Guest- Guest
- Post n°34
Re: 2016 NRL.com Fantasy Thread Part 34
Bren wrote:
My point is that I am trying to come up with a reason why the coach would do such a thing. I think you missed that point. Do you have a better explanation as to why he would do such a thing, if so I would love to hear it? Even Gus Gould is baffled as to the lineup.
I think its a joke of a line up I did from the very moment I first posted about it
Guest- Guest
- Post n°35
Re: 2016 NRL.com Fantasy Thread Part 34
Mighty Fishes wrote:
I think its a joke of a line up I did from the very moment I first posted about it
But why would he play Aubs and Guerra in the CTRs if he didn't want as much experience out there as possible? I am truly baffled. I can't think of any other reason.
RandomSil- Moderator
- Posts : 9953
Reputation : 3222
Join date : 2015-01-12
Age : 32
- Post n°36
Re: 2016 NRL.com Fantasy Thread Part 34
Perhaps.. now hear me out.. He has no idea what he is doing.Bren wrote:
But why would he play Aubs and Guerra in the CTRs if he didn't want as much experience out there as possible? I am truly baffled. I can't think of any other reason.
Guest- Guest
- Post n°37
Re: 2016 NRL.com Fantasy Thread Part 34
Bren wrote:
But why would he play Aubs and Guerra in the CTRs if he didn't want as much experience out there as possible? I am truly baffled. I can't think of any other reason.
If he wanted the most experience Hastings would still be in the side
Guest- Guest
- Post n°38
Re: 2016 NRL.com Fantasy Thread Part 34
Random wrote:
Perhaps.. now hear me out.. He has no idea what he is doing.
I think he knows his job is safe and doesn't give a fuck
m0nty (FanLeague)- Posts : 575
Reputation : 109
Join date : 2015-10-26
- Post n°39
Re: 2016 NRL.com Fantasy Thread Part 34
Left Peats in my NPRs, poor week again from me.
filthridden- Moderator
- Posts : 19240
Reputation : 12118
Join date : 2015-09-27
- Post n°40
Re: 2016 NRL.com Fantasy Thread Part 34
Bren wrote:
But why would he play Aubs and Guerra in the CTRs if he didn't want as much experience out there as possible? I am truly baffled. I can't think of any other reason.
To be fair, Gould would be baffled if someone did the 'pull a coin from behind your ear' trick.