JGraham, JBromwich, Fifita, Surgess
Mannering, Fensom, ET, Gillett, Guerra, NPR
NRL Fantasy Fanatics - A place for discussion of NRL Fantasy / Virtual Sports / Super Coach and other Fantasy Sports
Bren wrote:
Please keep your sexual fantasies to yourself.
JDB follows me on Twitter.SI wrote:
Too late
Bren wrote:
JDB follows me on Twitter.
Roger8 wrote:I'm so stacked in my FRF and 2RF :S
JGraham, JBromwich, Fifita, Surgess
Mannering, Fensom, ET, Gillett, Guerra, NPR
surmo13 wrote:you know what? kicking around back here in the 9000's, away from the people that are actually threatening to win something, with no Captain Cam, means I should take the chance to live a little, fuck it, Captain Hunt come on down! I eagerly anticipate your 40-odd so I can watch Vice-Captain Graham hit 70 later a couple games later
Liverpool_Bulldog wrote:
No loopholing this week??
surmo13 wrote:
i don't loophole, no skin off my nose to the people that do, if it's not against the rules, have at it, but it's always had to much of an 'against the spirit of the game' vibe for me.
charliemurphy wrote:
I can only assume Ma'u got his score due to Scott being injured. He hasn't been pushing up good scores. We know what ET is capable of and could very quickly become a keeper/gun if given a chance.
TheSpiritOfRiverPhoenix wrote:Interested to know if the peeps who are trading in Hughes for Lamb are doing so because they already have Feeney ?
At this stage Lamb is not due back till round 20 and Mullen is currently listed as returning "late season" on the casualty ward site (http://www.nrl.com/nrl-casualty-ward/tabid/10874/newsid/93149/default.aspx)
Would have thought that Feeney (assuming he keeps his place until Lamb or Mullen return) would play more games than Hughes whose shelf life is limited to when Morgan comes back.
Am I missing something here ?
Guilty as charged here. Hoping Feeney can't be that poor at his natural position.GreenMachine wrote:
Yeah missing that Feeney is complete and utter shite and awful AE. People are opting for a geniune 0pt NPR over here for season end. Those lucky enough not to already still own him (guilty)
Liverpool_Bulldog wrote:
Guilty as charged here. Hoping Feeney can't be that poor at his natural position.
TheSpiritOfRiverPhoenix wrote:Interested to know if the peeps who are trading in Hughes for Lamb are doing so because they already have Feeney ?
At this stage Lamb is not due back till round 20 and Mullen is currently listed as returning "late season" on the casualty ward site (http://www.nrl.com/nrl-casualty-ward/tabid/10874/newsid/93149/default.aspx)
Would have thought that Feeney (assuming he keeps his place until Lamb or Mullen return) would play more games than Hughes whose shelf life is limited to when Morgan comes back.
Am I missing something here ?
Rippin and Tearin wrote:I thought Ma'u continued to play out on the edge but I might be wrong and played his usual 80in. I'm not that familiar with positional play though (perhaps he came into the middle for a bit??) but it seemed like he just had a slightly better than average game boosted by a late LB and TBs and he got a TS as well earlier in the game. I think he added about 20 points in the last 5 minutes or so. Play just seemed to run his way quite a bit and he hardly drops off a tackle.
Dananz wrote:Is Mansour to Gordon a bad trade? Already have Aitken.