$10,000 RD1 Top League challenge

http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/sport/nrl/supercoach/nrl-supercoach-10k-league-creator-competition/news-story/9b780d6f80ab9e9725204999b1dbe65e


SUPERCOACH IS GIVING AWAY $10,000 TO THE TOP 20MAN LEAGUE IN ROUND 1 ONLY

ELITE LEAGUE JUST FOR THE 10K

CODE: 553225

Holy fuck! Great marketing because I have never played but now want to.

Can one person create 20 exact same squads stacked with guns and no care for future rounds?

Bren wrote:Can one person create 20 exact same squads stacked with guns and no care for future rounds?

Thats my normal strategy anyway.

Bren wrote:Can one person create 20 exact same squads stacked with guns and no care for future rounds?

I suspect that the winning league will have a bunch of very similar teams - probably who have exactly 17 players take the field

Possible they'll be playing short in one position for deliberate use of an AE

Certainly nobody in the winning league will be challenging for overall

I would have no problem starting a team if you were to help me with it. Just let me know.

is everyone here making a separate team just for round 1 or going with their overall sc team?
if it's separate team will do tonight.

I was planning in making a seperate team

All NPRs minimum price and picking players based solely on round 1 lineups.

I'd like to go with Milchs idea and use WAGs teams. Should we all pick the same team? Only 17 guys playing and use VC loophole?

If it's purely a rd1 team I'm happy to jump in if your not full. Loopholing would have to be the safest bet wouldn't it?

Yeah Krump purely rd1 teams only, no full year commitment.

My wife is having trouble registering a new account at the moment though.

Shanbon wrote:Yeah Krump purely rd1 teams only, no full year commitment.

My wife is having trouble registering a new account at the moment though.

I have some family members who've shown a real interest in SuperCoach this year but have never played before. They'd need a lot of input from someone who's played before if your interested.

If its just about the money i think its best we all pick the same 17 players like Milch said. Open to discuss who those 17 guys are. Im off to work now but should have time to pick a team and post up for thoughts.

From memory last year this was only open to subscribers of the Daily Telegraph. If that has changed I'm in

My wife and I have our own teams, I'll get her to enter if there are still spots.

Plenty of spots. Only conditions are it must be 20 man league and must be filled, no celebrity teams no merged unfilled leagues and all teams must be completed

hey i just joined team name $10000. real imaginative i know.

i think we should steer clear of defensive games like the first two, maybe the raiders cows at least in the backline.

sharks v broncs
storm v bulldogs
raiders v cowboys (maybe)

i have a feeling rabbits tigers may be high scoring with tedesco a good pick for tiges, not sure who would score for the rabbits
and myabe the panthers game will be high scoriung as well
what do you think about this?

Yeah I'm all for loading up on warriors panthers tigers backs

If we have a solid C option in case the VC fails I think Kaysa/Brailey offer the best value for money of almost any player. SJ vs Knights seems obvious captaincy choice but majority of players will be doing that. Think we need a POD captain

I remember last year that backs didn't score so well against the knights, at least not as well as you'd hope.

Shame there's no mansour