Bren wrote:
Why would anyone sign Luke Brooks.
Agree but that's the deal the dogs have put forward, the Tigers 4
Don't ask how they would be under the cap but they want the 4 of them
NRL Fantasy Fanatics - A place for discussion of NRL Fantasy / Virtual Sports / Super Coach and other Fantasy Sports
Bren wrote:
Why would anyone sign Luke Brooks.
Bren wrote:
Why would anyone sign Luke Brooks.
MrCashman wrote:
Agree but that's the deal the dogs have put forward, the Tigers 4
Don't ask how they would be under the cap but they want the 4 of them
Showbags wrote:
Probably count 1.5-2mill towards Cap, rest paid by 3rd party agreements. So then working it out, its Teddy Woods and Moses for 1.5-2mill....we will just assume brooks doesn't make first grade
Shanbon wrote:735 pending updates dropped another 1800 places to 4000
Spectre wrote:Bren wrote:
Funny you say that as that's the only way you will be getting him in Ultimate
I take that as a no to the aubbo offer then
3rd party agreements, no doubt they will make it work....no matter how dodgy it isMrCashman wrote:
Dogs would have to let go about 6 to 7 players...plus the players already there on big coin...it would be the biggest rort since Brisbanes team in the 90s
Happy enough going forward with the trades I made this week but both my trade ins got beaten score wise by my trade outsSI wrote:Ted 51
MCK 41
Moses 52
Woods 48
Sue 35
ET 51
Slater 46
Jacks 25
JBrom 25
Cam 58
Faufusi 38
KBrom 34
zorasdomain wrote:Dugan 56
McInnes 48
Vaughan 80
Frizz 63
JDB 52
RTS 20
SJ 52
Mannering 54
No updates for first game yet.
SI wrote:
You've been offered a 45+ average hooker for him to sort your problems.
Johnny B Goode wrote:
SJ is too good for the team he plays for. Yes he overplays his hand but when you're the only person doing something it's little wonder