Random wrote:
Graham on 13 and Vaughan on 19.
Vaugahn 19?? he has had 2 errors and a penalty?
NRL Fantasy Fanatics - A place for discussion of NRL Fantasy / Virtual Sports / Super Coach and other Fantasy Sports
Random wrote:
Graham on 13 and Vaughan on 19.
Mearcats wrote:Boyd reaching at that hammie again
Random wrote:
Graham on 13 and Vaughan on 19.
So that was 25min in the first half, what if his second half is a shorter stint (as tends to happens with some players), say 15min. Does that put him at around 30 assuming he has no negatives?Welshy wrote:
I got him for 2 errors and 1 MT, so around 18 if not for the errors
matching Graham, Vaughan I would imagine
Archer wrote:
So that was 25min in the first half, what if his second half is a shorter stint (as tends to happens with some players), say 15min. Does that put him at around 30 assuming he has no negatives?
rhinoceroo wrote:Clowns. https://twitter.com/CKennedy80/status/971681257292615680?s=09
Heh, what I'm saying is you guys are saying he did well and its only because of some negatives that his score looks bad. What I'm saying is if you take away the negatives, is a top score of 30 really "good"? Whats he priced at? Sounds to me like you can expect a least a few MT as part of his score.Welshy wrote:
I'd snap your hand off for a 30 right now!