Rabbit wrote:
This is exactly why I hate the loophole. Spuds benefit from nothing but luck.
He's not loopholing he's getting an emergency or is this another one of your jokes?
NRL Fantasy Fanatics - A place for discussion of NRL Fantasy / Virtual Sports / Super Coach and other Fantasy Sports
Rabbit wrote:
This is exactly why I hate the loophole. Spuds benefit from nothing but luck.
BBowler wrote:
Some people will still want one more week to see if its a fluke.
Loomer wrote:
He's not loopholing he's getting an emergency or is this another one of your jokes?
surmo13 wrote:SI wrote:
Haha, likewise, nearly a month later and still don't have him.
oh wow!... i didn't realise you both didn't grab him after that giant talk-up, sorry if it came across like rubbing it in or anything
Is that THE loophole that everyone's been going on about? Seems difficult to intentionally replicate. Or am I missing something?Rabbit wrote:
This is exactly why I hate the loophole. Spuds benefit from nothing but luck.
mattnz wrote:
Quite possible, was continually beating markers, not the line
Just spat out my pasta. BrilliantRabbit wrote:
He’s owed the line break assist for Clark and probably two of his own. Plus about 4 tackles. I expect he’ll update by 8 after they find some dodgy missed tackles. 76 is my prediction. Over to you Ramesh, you cheating cunt.
Rabbit wrote:
Same difference. Picks some a Gumby to start. Gets points. Don’t nit pick....unless they’re out of your ranga beard champ.
Spuddies wrote:Is that THE loophole that everyone's been going on about? Seems difficult to intentionally replicate. Or am I missing something?Rabbit wrote:
This is exactly why I hate the loophole. Spuds benefit from nothing but luck.
Spuddies wrote:
Is that THE loophole that everyone's been going on about? Seems difficult to intentionally replicate. Or am I missing something?
Boozecluez wrote:
Who are these some people?
Hahaha, wasn't the ideal circumstance playing him. I knew he was going to get limited minutes. I'm happy with the AE regardless. What % did you say luck was in fantasy again?Rabbit wrote:
No you just jagged a flukey emergency after possibly the worst halves selection in history. He was never going to get many minutes. I wish he’d got about 3 then we wouldn’t be having this conversation at all.
The loophole is intentional. Yours wasn’t.
Syzy wrote:Surprised people are trading Doueihi out tbh.
Wouldn't be surprised to see 30-40 mins from him tonight. They looked better with him on last week.
Loomer wrote:
Do you complain of cheating if they make changes to the interchange rules in the real game because they are different from before and you liked it better?
Syzy wrote:Syzy wrote:Surprised people are trading Doueihi out tbh.
Wouldn't be surprised to see 30-40 mins from him tonight. They looked better with him on last week.
Obviously wrong thread. Was meant to be in the big calls.
Spuddies wrote:
Hahaha, wasn't the ideal circumstance playing him. I knew he was going to get limited minutes. I'm happy with the AE regardless. What % did you say luck was in fantasy again?
Welshy wrote:ARey 46 with a forced drop out to be added and zero attacking stats. I'll take that @Pain
He can do what he likes aslong as he starts producing some decent fantasy scoresPain wrote:
He looked better tonight. Would like to see him run it more and pressure the defensive line.
Rabbit wrote:
No you just jagged a flukey emergency after possibly the worst halves selection in history. He was never going to get many minutes. I wish he’d got about 3 then we wouldn’t be having this conversation at all.
The loophole is intentional. Yours wasn’t.