Krump wrote:
yep
Thanks
NRL Fantasy Fanatics - A place for discussion of NRL Fantasy / Virtual Sports / Super Coach and other Fantasy Sports
Krump wrote:
yep
Not sure how it translates but season average in scRippin and Tearin wrote:
Interesting although I have no clue what 1 SC point translates to in NRLF - is it about 1:1?
Rippin and Tearin wrote:
Interesting although I have no clue what 1 SC point translates to in NRLF - is it about 1:1?
Fortitude wrote:If I have murray in my 13-17 and he doesn't play, do I just get the first person on the EMG?
*not interested In poolhoping.
SoylentGreen wrote:
Not really - attacking points are prioritised in SC, so backs have inflated averages (though there's no KM, so that brings the halves back slightly)
For reference, the Fantasy scores for those rounds:
Round 1: Kodi Nikorima - 14 points
Round 2: Chad Townsend - 49 points
Round 3: Ash Taylor - 20 points
Round 4: Mitchell Pearce - 36 points
Round 5: Adam Reynolds - 32 points
Round 6: Chad Townsend - 17 points
Krump wrote:
So only People down in the rankings should ask questions? Maybe admin could also introduce a system that tracks rankings and you can't answer questions unless you're in the top 1000 as well.
Ignore it bulldog. Some of the shit getting posted today is COMPLETELY against the tone and direction that makes this place great!
Revraiser wrote:
Cheating bastard.
Fortitude wrote:
The air is nice and clean up here on the moral high ground.
SI wrote:Every single poster on here adds value to the forum just by posting. If someone doesn't like the way someone else posts then it has already been pointed out that you can block them by adding them to your foes. The other option is to do what the vast majority on here already do and scroll past without having to make a point of it.
Everyone is entitled to post exactly what and how they want, within the parameters everyone is aware of.
My personal viewpoint is I much prefer coming in here and reading pages and pages of input from people FAR MORE than reading comments from posters complaining about other posters.
SI wrote:Every single poster on here adds value to the forum just by posting.
I am actually trading out both this week.ice_berg86 wrote:Who would you trade out of Griffin or Lodge. I know griffin plays round 13 but his scores are affected with Levi on the bench and Lodge has the rib injury. Griffin will also loss more money if he scores around the 30 - 35.
I wasn't going to trade this week as i only have 24 left, but S'ua will be a good CC if he can average 35 over the next few weeks... (I already have Gosie)
Are you trying to avoid the softcock award? You know thats not gonna happen right?SI wrote:Every single poster on here adds value to the forum just by posting. If someone doesn't like the way someone else posts then it has already been pointed out that you can block them by adding them to your foes. The other option is to do what the vast majority on here already do and scroll past without having to make a point of it.
Everyone is entitled to post exactly what and how they want, within the parameters everyone is aware of.
My personal viewpoint is I much prefer coming in here and reading pages and pages of input from people FAR MORE than reading comments from posters complaining about other posters.
Moose wrote:
Hey! Take that back!
I contribute fuck all to this forum.
Krump wrote:
Are you trying to avoid the softcock award? You know thats not gonna happen right?
Same hereFortitude wrote:If I have murray in my 13-17 and he doesn't play, do I just get the first person on the EMG?
*not interested In poolhoping.
Shumway wrote:Can we create a separate thread to voice our opinions about whether the discussion is too much or too little?