Milchcow wrote:
I don't believe they are WL's comments.
He's just cut and paste someone else's comments from reddit as an example of other people's drivel
Ah, ok. That wasn't really clear. Drivel either way
NRL Fantasy Fanatics - A place for discussion of NRL Fantasy / Virtual Sports / Super Coach and other Fantasy Sports
Milchcow wrote:
I don't believe they are WL's comments.
He's just cut and paste someone else's comments from reddit as an example of other people's drivel
Krump wrote:He’s ripped Gus and good on him for it.
Krump wrote:He’s certainly got class. I’d recommend anyone who didn’t see it to have a look
wolfking wrote:
I don't think he really ripped it to him as much as I thought he might have or he should have, but saying that, at the same time, he kind of did, but the way he spoke and handled himself and answered questions about Gus was all class. He basically stated what was true and what was not but never degraded Gus or anyone or made himself look bitter or spiteful. Definitely worth watching, he certainly made Gus look like the c**t here.
I was going to play Cleary in my 17 but by the sounds of the support he had, I wouldn't be surprised if this backfires and the team just don't turn up for the rest of the season. Ivan should tell Gus to get fucked and get Nathan to the Tigers.
wolfking wrote:Yeah cheers Stu, whoops, brainfart. Funny how when you type what you're thinking sometimes you just type something completely the opposite without even picking up on it. Must be getting Alzheimers.
wolfking wrote:Yeah cheers Stu, whoops, brainfart. Funny how when you type what you're thinking sometimes you just type something completely the opposite without even picking up on it. Must be getting Alzheimers.
StuDogg101 wrote:wolfking wrote:Yeah cheers Stu, whoops, brainfart. Funny how when you type what you're thinking sometimes you just type something completely the opposite without even picking up on it. Must be getting Alzheimers.
I have done it on here numerous times. Mentioned the same team/player twice when I meant their opposition or whatever. Fail
SI wrote:
Fair enough though, you must be at least 210 in Dogg years right?
StuDogg101 wrote:SI wrote:
Fair enough though, you must be at least 210 in Dogg years right?
210 in Dogg years so...pretty youthful in human years, yeah?
SI wrote:
Fair enough though, you must be at least 210 in Wolf year's right?
Oz Sport Mad wrote:SI wrote:
I set 360 to series link Monday night as I'd started to forget about watching it. He'll no doubt be diplomatic as he needs another job. He did apply for the Tigers job when Potter got sacked...
Well he can't be too diplomatic because at the moment Gus is justifying his crazy decision by badmouthing the bloke left right and centre.
Effectively will need to defend the idea that he's too old school and lost the support of players, who were still winning games of football (e.g. imagine what would happen if they were losing).
wolfking wrote:SI wrote:
Fair enough though, you must be at least 210 in Wolf year's right?
Woah, hold up there........it's only about 150 wolf years, steady on, I ain't that old.
How do mod years work, would you be something like 001001010 then?
(please don't ban me )
SI wrote:
Did you catch it mate? I am going to say in the context of everything that it was the best Rugby League interview I have ever seen. I saw a lot of stuff said about Hook from the Broncos, but his record at the Panthers can't be questioned. That on top of how well he spoke tonight, I would have no hesitation in him being a straight swap for Cleary next year, or even now.
Oz Sport Mad wrote:SI wrote:
Did you catch it mate? I am going to say in the context of everything that it was the best Rugby League interview I have ever seen. I saw a lot of stuff said about Hook from the Broncos, but his record at the Panthers can't be questioned. That on top of how well he spoke tonight, I would have no hesitation in him being a straight swap for Cleary next year, or even now.
I'm still yet to watch the interview mate but as a Broncos fan, he was great at our club.
Can't knock the club for having to push him aside to make room for the best coach that has ever coached but had it been anyone else other than Bennett, I'm sure Hook would have been retained.
Hopefully it's not a similar situation at the Panfers.......
SI wrote:
Try to watch it mate. Whilst there is a hint of preparation/formula in the first 5 minutes, no doubt on Fox' behalf, the next half hour is incredibly controlled and objective considering the bloke just got shafted out of nowhere with his team in the Top 5 for what we all know was to bring Cleary in regardless of the shit Gould has spun.