Mulvy wrote:
Did you captain him for his -1 or whatever it was? I'm not starting shit, just know that many would have unfortunately.
I don't really remember that game and no I didn't thankfully.
NRL Fantasy Fanatics - A place for discussion of NRL Fantasy / Virtual Sports / Super Coach and other Fantasy Sports
Mulvy wrote:
Did you captain him for his -1 or whatever it was? I'm not starting shit, just know that many would have unfortunately.
Mulvy wrote:
Haha, classic MTM!!
Milchy wrote:
They've lost Nightingale and MacDonald, so both wing spots up for grabs.
Pereira would be the other guy in contention
Right wing for Rav going off of what dragons forum is saying at the momentMulvy wrote:
I think my point was lost. Does anyone know which side they have been training on? because let's say Ravlalava and Lomax are the two replacements, isn't it important which side they are on? The trial suggests Lomax, one of the highest owned players is on a right wing outside Aitken. Hmmm.
Milchy wrote:
They've lost Nightingale and MacDonald, so both wing spots up for grabs.
Pereira would be the other guy in contention
WT2K wrote:
Right wing for Rav going off of what dragons forum is saying at the moment
churg wrote:did nikora play well tonight?
Zeakeous wrote:
I am also curious to hear how he went.
Any update would be much appreciated.
WT2K wrote:TPJ “It is my right one. I felt a pop."
https://www.nrl.com/news/2019/02/23/brisbane-broncos-stroll-to-win-over-wynnum/
Zeakeous wrote:Mart I also ask what everyones thoughts are on clifford, do you think he is a chance to get the gig over T Martin?
Would it be a shit go running 2 nqld's in Morgan & clifford?
Mulvy wrote:
It's a risk, but like I said about the Warriors thing earlier today I don't have a problem (sharing roles in the same side) with it if you can justify both selections. But you've got to consider them on their merits. If Clifford starts and is goal kicker and he's priced at 27 or so I say yes. Maybe. And if Morgan lines up next to him priced at 30, but you think he might get (who knows) 45+, then there's an argument to have both.
A similar argument could be made for Moses and Brown. I'm not going there but Brown looks the goods and is basement price. Moses will now be dominant half, have full gk duties and you could argue a beefed up pack.
Random Mulvy opinions. Thoughts?
Bagpipe wrote:
I'd agree if Clifford was to be confirmed as the GK I'd consider him an option. But that whole TMM/Clifford duel may not end with round 1. I'd hate to think someone picks up Clifford only for his form to drop for 2 games and be replaced by TMM or vice versa until one cements the position. GEEEZ, it's risky. But so was a sex tape by Kim Kardashian, follow your dreams kids
Bagpipe wrote:I would go as far to say that if Pengai is injured, it's actually a larger problem for those who decided to start without him.
As a highly picked FRF option, if you had thought he wasn't worth the price then you may have had a good jump on the competition. Now that 27.4% ownership has to move to perhaps that player you thought you had under the radar. GOD SPEED PENGAI