Krump wrote:
That's without mentioning how bad their pack are. Sucked in Manly
Don't be a child
NRL Fantasy Fanatics - A place for discussion of NRL Fantasy / Virtual Sports / Super Coach and other Fantasy Sports
Krump wrote:
That's without mentioning how bad their pack are. Sucked in Manly
Krump wrote:
That's without mentioning how bad their pack are. Sucked in Manly
jant wrote:What is generally considered a good score for round 1?
Lucky bastard. Must have been fucked by fairiesPonga for prez wrote:came in clutch, swapped out blake lawrie for keighren 5 mins before kickoff
VERTiiGO wrote:im not a vet at Fantasy, whats this "loop" i keep seeing?
jant wrote:What is generally considered a good score for round 1?
Normally I'd say 750 is good. Maybe 800 this year but it's hard to say. We're skewed here because the cookie cutter guys are all doing welljant wrote:What is generally considered a good score for round 1?
Ponga for prez wrote:taupau or lolo?
Last few years 800, then after a few weeks start seeing 900’s. This year seems to be 900 straight off the bat.jant wrote:What is generally considered a good score for round 1?
mattnz wrote:
Want 900+. Last season 900 would have put you in top 5 for round 1.
MilfordTheMagician wrote:
Taupau
Ponga for prez wrote:
any particular reasons?
mattnz wrote:
Want 900+. Last season 900 would have put you in top 5 for round 1.
MilfordTheMagician wrote:
More responsibilty on his shoulder, shit Manly bench.
Lolo the opposite this season. Cows have a lot of depth in the forwards.