HomeRevraiser wrote:
You must be here for Host and Lawrie talk then ?
NRL Fantasy 2019 Part 20
Mulvy- Moderator
- Posts : 22374
Reputation : 13731
Join date : 2016-01-26
Location : Mulvania
Ponga Yeo the Mann- Posts : 2468
Reputation : 2694
Join date : 2019-03-16
Age : 33
Location : Newcastle
Daedalus wrote:
Bump
Holland and the cash to go Rava to Burns next week is the smart option right?
Makes sense. Sivo and rava will be up and down. Burns looks worth the doll hairs
Krump- Posts : 8454
Reputation : 4770
Join date : 2015-07-31
Location : Your mums room
Milchy gave the Bateman verdict on the last page. Rava to burns seems the way to go to meDaedalus wrote:
Bump
Holland and the cash to go Rava to Burns next week is the smart option right?
Rapture_NRL- Posts : 3293
Reputation : 1193
Join date : 2017-02-28
Location : Earth
Daedalus wrote:
Bump
Holland and the cash to go Rava to Burns next week is the smart option right?
Too hard to tell without knowing your team and strategy
mattnz- Fanatic
- Posts : 19887
Reputation : 7191
Join date : 2018-03-11
Location : Your pool
How much better does that Canberra side look now that we know Bateman is a gun, CNK solid at the back and Rapana back next to BJ.
Reklaw- Posts : 959
Reputation : 453
Join date : 2017-06-08
Going to stick with Lane>Bateman. Probably a bit sideways, but gives me a keeper centre when I didn't grab Capewell to go with Holland. And I can shift Gillet up to my starting second row.
Ponga Yeo the Mann- Posts : 2468
Reputation : 2694
Join date : 2019-03-16
Age : 33
Location : Newcastle
mattnz wrote:How much better does that Canberra side look now that we know Bateman is a gun, CNK solid at the back and Rapana back next to BJ.
If only they weren’t stuck with the salad and the jail bird in the halves
When does that pommy half join the party? Next season?
Krump- Posts : 8454
Reputation : 4770
Join date : 2015-07-31
Location : Your mums room
If CNK and Bateman stand up against real opposition they’re realmattnz wrote:How much better does that Canberra side look now that we know Bateman is a gun, CNK solid at the back and Rapana back next to BJ.
chance at sneaking into the 8 maybe.
my tv broke- Fanatics Immortal
- Posts : 28424
Reputation : 21079
Join date : 2016-01-08
Canberra werent really* tested against the Titans. It will be interesting to see how they go against the Storm.
*werent tested at all
*werent tested at all
Last edited by my tv broke on Fri Mar 22, 2019 5:41 pm; edited 1 time in total
Krump- Posts : 8454
Reputation : 4770
Join date : 2015-07-31
Location : Your mums room
Going off his highlights he’s got a great kicking and running game but passes left to right about as well as the DragonsPonga Yeo the Mann wrote:
If only they weren’t stuck with the salad and the jail bird in the halves
When does that pommy half join the party? Next season?
Guest- Guest
Even though I've done Holland to Bateman myself (already have Burns) id probably go with holding Holland and getting Burns in.Daedalus wrote:
Bump
Holland and the cash to go Rava to Burns next week is the smart option right?
Milchcow- Moderator
- Posts : 25407
Reputation : 17833
Join date : 2015-07-31
Krump wrote:
Milchy gave the Bateman verdict on the last page. Rava to burns seems the way to go to me
I think Burns and Holland is better than Bateman + Rava though.
I think Morgan is a better trade in than Bateman too, for those that don't have him.
I'm still torn over Bateman. I think he can get 50+ average. But I also originally had Holland for 40-45. I'm worried if I bring Bateman in I'll regret not having the cash next week.
15 minutes to confirm (currently rolling with Bateman)
Milchcow- Moderator
- Posts : 25407
Reputation : 17833
Join date : 2015-07-31
Reklaw wrote:Going to stick with Lane>Bateman. Probably a bit sideways, but gives me a keeper centre when I didn't grab Capewell to go with Holland. And I can shift Gillet up to my starting second row.
What's wrong with Nikora to go with Holland? Please tell me you have Nikora somewhere
mattnz- Fanatic
- Posts : 19887
Reputation : 7191
Join date : 2018-03-11
Location : Your pool
Milchy wrote:
I think Burns and Holland is better than Bateman + Rava though.
I think Morgan is a better trade in than Bateman too, for those that don't have him.
I'm still torn over Bateman. I think he can get 50+ average. But I also originally had Holland for 40-45. I'm worried if I bring Bateman in I'll regret not having the cash next week.
15 minutes to confirm (currently rolling with Bateman)
What trades would you do next week instead?
Reklaw- Posts : 959
Reputation : 453
Join date : 2017-06-08
Milchy wrote:
What's wrong with Nikora to go with Holland? Please tell me you have Nikora somewhere
Well yeah, he's on the bench haha. But someone's dropping out for Graham eventually
standard-issue- Moderator
- Posts : 19768
Reputation : 10004
Join date : 2015-08-03
Age : 28
Haha, I see what you did there!!!Ponga Yeo the Mann wrote:I hate fucking spiders, no way I’m going intawebs.
I doubt they enjoy it either SI
Guest- Guest
MilfordTheMagician wrote:Played Lawrie over Host thank god but had Rava at WFB. It's safe to say I won't be playing him next week and since Garrick is my backup I will be forced into 2 trades to afford Burns.
I was shocked to see how much the Dragons avoided their right hand side in attack. They are 0-2, maybe they should change things up and start attacking the right hand side a bit more? Predictable footy gets you no where.
I reckon we might see a bit of Lomax on that side soon,
Krump- Posts : 8454
Reputation : 4770
Join date : 2015-07-31
Location : Your mums room
My worry is him being pushed out to centre. Say it happens for a total of 80 minutes this year that’s a whole week of scoring gone. Welshy also seems very confident of him going to an edge and he even though Welshy is hopeless he at least watches eslMilchy wrote:
I think Burns and Holland is better than Bateman + Rava though.
I think Morgan is a better trade in than Bateman too, for those that don't have him.
I'm still torn over Bateman. I think he can get 50+ average. But I also originally had Holland for 40-45. I'm worried if I bring Bateman in I'll regret not having the cash next week.
15 minutes to confirm (currently rolling with Bateman)
Archer- Posts : 6604
Reputation : 2306
Join date : 2016-01-12
Location : Who's asking
Going to chew up, bubbler on and spit out each and every pack they come up against, starting tonight.ryno_ wrote:
Raiders probably have the best pack in the ACT but aren't going to trouble the top 5 for the NRL.
Guest- Guest
Finch wrote:Not to sound like a dick but... I don't come to this thread to know about a TV show I wont be watching.
Just Saying.
(Please don't hate me)
I know that. You come here for golf scores and fishing results.
I’ll whip up a post tomorrow after the round.