It would be funny if the powers that be decided that the problem with Fantasy is the scoring system and not the fact that their product never works properly for the first month of the competition.
Fantasy players like to heap scorn on Supercoach scoring, but if nothing else they do a better job of evening up the scoring ability between positions.
I'd still play Fantasy over supercoach if they both had the same scoring.
Fantasy has a better position mix (HLF, CTR WFB is better than HLF,FE, CTW, FLB)
Fantasy has live scoring and rank updates
Price changes from round 1 are much better than 2 free looks
Fantasy (used to) have drag and drop trades, maybe we could get that back.
The free bench and ranked subs is better than supercoach's AE system (with or without the poophole)
Fantasy don't have a paywall behind every single article about their product
Supercoach is much more professionally presented and marketed though