NRL Fantasy 2019 Part 42

Milikache wrote:

If Bird did bad, I was going to bring Nikora to bench to cover centres and then mov eGarner up.

i've softened on looping but wow that's a gross way to do it, i need a break from the forum

danseels1985 wrote:Like a few others I’m 4/301 and 70th overall atm

Lol, ive gone from 321st to 16th tonight. Obviously wont last, but runs on the board etc

Liverpool_Bulldog wrote:

Haha yes it is messy.

What happened to Gilletts minutes tonight?

Don't even worry mate.  Pencil your trade in now.  Fuck him off.

Loomer wrote:

Post Rd1 trade Twal out lol

And then I brought him back in for his 39 and 42

WT Winfield wrote:

SI wrote:

Yeah, that's the worry.  

Hard to say whether a really late call on what happened just before the Murray play, or really early call on the next play the ball after the siren.  Stats guys love to NOT add the last 30 seconds of stats in the live call in pretty much every game.  Thinking they were calling back the whole thing to something just prior to the Murray run though

On SC scoring they have:

80:00 Cameron Murray tackle bust. (x2)
80:00 Jack Bird error.
79:55 Anthony Milford offload.

I was hoping for a linebreak too..

DT and Fantasy use the same stats provider but I don't know anything about SC; with SC and DT being under the same umbrella does that mean they also use the same provider? NRL.com live call updates are normally pretty good but not working right now.

SI wrote:

DT and Fantasy use the same stats provider but I don't know anything about SC; with SC and DT being under the same umbrella does that mean they also use the same provider?  NRL.com live call updates are normally pretty good but not working right now.

Ah, I was thinking they all used the same, but scored a little differently.

Tackle counts are different between SC and NRLF now I see, so I guess different providers.

Still a chance that SC takes the TBs away with all their constant stat fidgeting until final stats on Monday.

I'm hoping for the LB to be added instead though

WT Winfield wrote:Let's all quote the giant ass pic that's in the wrong thread, hence people not having a clue what's going on

There's a giant ass pic thread?

wolfking wrote:

Don't even worry mate.  Pencil your trade in now.  Fuck him off.

Yeah mate locked in now. No longer plays 80 so has to go

Liverpool_Bulldog wrote:

Yeah mate locked in now. No longer plays 80 so has to go

But probably will start playing the full 80 once you do.

Cake Tiger wrote:

There's a giant ass pic thread?

Yeah, but you've gotta be a mod or friends with one to view them, in which case they'll just send them to you via PM.

Keep'em coming SI

Cake Tiger wrote:

There's a giant ass pic thread?

Deardon owed a line break i believe.

For a half who did zero kicking 36 aint a bad first score for him. Should see some decent scores when he gets a few more opportunities kicking and in attack

Milikache wrote:

But probably will start playing the full 80 once you do.

I'll buy a half then won't have to worry haha

Liverpool_Bulldog wrote:

Yeah mate locked in now. No longer plays 80 so has to go

Yeah good call...........he'll score 77 next week.

MilfordTheMagician wrote:

Bird just grabs the ball and runs sideways, pointless.

I think you'll find he gets lots of points from it.

wolfking wrote:

Yeah good call...........he'll score 77 next week.

Thought you were a good dude

Milchy wrote:

luckynumber8 wrote:

I think Bird has to be in the 14-17

You think wrong

Just to clarify for LN8:  there was a time when a lot of us actually thought what you are saying is right, including me-that the sub had to be in your 14 to 17 to then go into your 1-13; and your 18-21 could only sub into your 14-17 (your 18-21 could NOT sub into your 1-13).  

This comes back to FanHub's ambivalent wording.  We've since learned that in practise, your 14-21 can all sub into your 1-13, position and ranking dependent obviously.

Hopefully that makes sense and I haven't FanHubbed it even more  

SI wrote:

Just to clarify for LN8:  there was a time when a lot of us actually thought what you are saying is right, including me-that the sub had to be in your 14 to 17 to then go into your 1-13; and your 18-21 could only sub into your 14-17 (your 18-21 could NOT sub into your 1-13).  

This comes back to FanHub's ambivalent wording.  We've since learned that in practise, your 14-21 can all sub into your 1-13, position and ranking dependent obviously.

Hopefully that makes sense and I haven't FanHubbed it even more  

You should put this explanation in GIF form?

MilfordTheMagician wrote:Decent score for Dearden first up, especially in a blowout. I doubt he makes 27 tackles every week, probably closer to 20.

I think he was pretty good in real life too. forwards didn't really step up and the bounce of the ball just wasn't in your favour tonight. But he was solid.

Rabbit wrote:I’m 178th

17 bunnies in your team?