Weiland wrote:
Fuck, I only just got him in this week. Will it be because of the score?
We don't know.
Last week he moved to the halves when Liddle came on, but that was without Benji.
NRL Fantasy Fanatics - A place for discussion of NRL Fantasy / Virtual Sports / Super Coach and other Fantasy Sports
Weiland wrote:
Fuck, I only just got him in this week. Will it be because of the score?
Weiland wrote:
Yeah I know. But at his price I was hoping for a 80 minute hooker.
Cake Tiger wrote:
And I disagreed with it then too. What's happening is that a rich team can buy another home game. The Tigers have never taken a Warriors game to Mount Smart.
I also have issues with the unbalanced draw the NRL has but that's a rant for another day.
Verbal Kint wrote:Farah off
Milchy wrote:
Broncos aren't buying the game. I don't believe thy get any financial benefit. Manly get the money from hosting the game.
If they just got themselves a decent stadium in Sydney they wouldn't need to.
Most other teams in Sydney have realised you can't make money playing at shitty surburban grounds all the time. If Manly/other teams didn't sell home games they'd struggle more financially.
People whinge about a top 8 rewarding mediocrity, but one thing it does is mean everyone has a chance to play finals, even if they get a worse draw than other teams
filthridden wrote:Wonder if Farah's only gone off because of the scoreline. Wouldn't surprise me.
Makes it hard to judge whether he'll continue to play 80 regardless of the bench. :/
Teeth Eater wrote:
Yeah, happy with his score, but not what I was hoping for when I too made the purchase this week. I guess we can only hope it’s because of the score. I stupidly captained him too, which is a bit of a bummer considering what he’d have got if he played the 80.
Teeth Eater wrote:
I stupidly captained him too, which is a bit of a bummer considering what he’d have got if he played the 80.