Otherwise we don't want to touch Papenhuyzen, as if he goes back to bench utility he'll quickly lose all the cash he has made.
Last edited by Milchy on Wed May 22, 2019 2:06 am; edited 1 time in total
NRL Fantasy Fanatics - A place for discussion of NRL Fantasy / Virtual Sports / Super Coach and other Fantasy Sports
Milchy wrote:I think we should leave ourselves open to the possbility of Lawrie to Papenhuyzen if there is a late switch to the storm starting lineup.
Otherwise we don't want to touch Papenhuyzen, as if he goes back to bench utility he'll quickly lose all the cash he has made.
Verbal Kint wrote:I voted zero. None of the options really jump out so that tells me that holding is the best choice (IMO)
Krump wrote:Zero trades but Lawrie for Pap if he starts.
Not at allRippin and Tearin wrote:
Again, is this Pap starting thing something that has backing?
Milchy wrote:
Don't think there is anything credible on Pap starting, but, even ignoring fantasy scores, Papenhuyzen has been so electric the past 2 weeks it wouldn't surprise to see him given another go.
Assuming we haven't already traded him out, I think we can do Lawrie to Pap on Sunday without needing a vote, on the off chance Pap does get a start.
Milchy wrote:
Don't think there is anything credible on Pap starting, but, even ignoring fantasy scores, Papenhuyzen has been so electric the past 2 weeks it wouldn't surprise to see him given another go.
Assuming we haven't already traded him out, I think we can do Lawrie to Pap on Sunday without needing a vote, on the off chance Pap does get a start.
Milchy wrote:
Just another thing.
Currently it's close between 0 trades and 1 trade.
I voted 0 trades, and thuis didn't specify a trade in, and looks like most others were the same.
If 1 trade does surge in the voting, i think we might need to re-vote on trade-in target as there is no clear consensus and I figure most of those who voted no trades will want a say