Liverpool_Bulldog wrote:
A working mans 35 would be lovely pal, hell even 40 and I'll be happy
Definitely nothing over that, cheap as possible for next round. Cheers, SJ.
NRL Fantasy Fanatics - A place for discussion of NRL Fantasy / Virtual Sports / Super Coach and other Fantasy Sports
Liverpool_Bulldog wrote:
A working mans 35 would be lovely pal, hell even 40 and I'll be happy
I personally think to hold Munster for one week and if he flops sell to MilfordBethany_B wrote:Thoughts on Milf vs Hunt vs Moses as a replacement for Munster? I've got SJ pencilled in for next week but don't want to go early on him
Benefits of Milf: Better average than the other 2, good POD (4.5% owned) and plays the extra game in R16.
Drawbacks of Milf: Does not kick goals, and is more expensive.
Benefits of Hunt: Biggest POD (2.7% owned), costs 70k less than Milf
Drawbacks of Hunt: Does not play 16, does not kick goals
Benefits of Moses: Still a good POD (6.5% owned), kicks goals and costs 100k less than Milf.
Drawbacks of Moses: Does not play 16, is a bit less consistent
Benefits of keeping Munster: Saves me a trade
Drawbacks of keeping Munster: Recent scores are poor, does not play 16 and is not a POD (16.8% owned)
Ben Marlin wrote:
I personally think to hold Munster for one week and if he flops sell to Milford
Rippin and Tearin wrote:Im a bit surprised people so keen on SJ. I know his price is decent but when's the last time he strung 12 injury free games together? I haven't looked at his stats but I feel like this is the third year in a row where he has had pretty major injury issues.
Adrianoooo wrote:assuming Matterson plays origin, is he still a good trade in right now?
Bethany_B wrote:Thoughts on Milf vs Hunt vs Moses as a replacement for Munster? I've got SJ pencilled in for next week but don't want to go early on him
Benefits of Milf: Better average than the other 2, good POD (4.5% owned) and plays the extra game in R16.
Drawbacks of Milf: Does not kick goals, and is more expensive.
Benefits of Hunt: Biggest POD (2.7% owned), costs 70k less than Milf
Drawbacks of Hunt: Does not play 16, does not kick goals
Benefits of Moses: Still a good POD (6.5% owned), kicks goals and costs 100k less than Milf.
Drawbacks of Moses: Does not play 16, is a bit less consistent
Benefits of keeping Munster: Saves me a trade
Drawbacks of keeping Munster: Recent scores are poor, does not play 16 and is not a POD (16.8% owned)
If you are set on selling Munster then my advice would be to get Milford. But the choice is up to youBethany_B wrote:
I wouldnt mind doing that but the problem is that Munster's BE is over 70 and will lose a stack of cash if he flops. I'm personally leaning towards Moses because of the goalkicking and also that he has a good run home with 5 of the last 9 games at Bankwest.
Bethany_B wrote:
I wouldnt mind doing that but the problem is that Munster's BE is over 70 and will lose a stack of cash if he flops. I'm personally leaning towards Moses because of the goalkicking and also that he has a good run home with 5 of the last 9 games at Bankwest.
Welshy wrote:
Injury issues would be only problem for me mate, massive risk but i'd back him to average over 52 from now till end of season if he goes clean
Rippin and Tearin wrote:
For me the options are keep Munster or grab Milf.
Milf has the best average and plays an extra game. Therefore the trade nets you 60 points.
But he costs you $60k and a trade.
So I think the decision depends on the make up of the rest of your team, what you plans are through to round 17, how many trades you want to have left and therefore what makes the most sense.
WT2K wrote:
Definitely nothing over that, cheap as possible for next round. Cheers, SJ.
Rippin and Tearin wrote:
That's the big if though mate. I owned him last season and the problem with a guy like him is if he gets injured, at his price and his position, he's an automatic trade. You'll need to make sure you have a trade up your sleeve IMO if you wanna risk him.
Also 52? Thats better than his average from last year and 3 points better than what he was going at for the first 5 games of this year prior to being inured....
If I had to bet on it, I'd say he averages 50 when healthy, but 45 overall once you take into account the 15 minute injury affected game he is odds on to have before the season is out...
Its a tough one mate, I can see the appeal, but theres a huge risk there. He's an option for those that go into the final 8 games of the season with 4 or more trades up their sleeves IMO!
luckynumber8 wrote:The Charlie Sheen in me went a bit crazy and I brought in one too many hookers.
Who do you guys back to hold the rest of the year?
Farah (UP) or Mahoney (Down)
Cheers lads.
luckynumber8 wrote:The Charlie Sheen in me went a bit crazy and I brought in one too many hookers.
Who do you guys back to hold the rest of the year?
Farah (UP) or Mahoney (Down)
Cheers lads.
Rippin and Tearin wrote:Im a bit surprised people so keen on SJ. I know his price is decent but when's the last time he strung 12 injury free games together? I haven't looked at his stats but I feel like this is the third year in a row where he has had pretty major injury issues.
Liverpool_Bulldog wrote:
I'd rather it not be too low that we question whether he still has the goods ala RTS