NRL Fantasy 2019 Part 69

Johnny B Goode wrote:

Better to just run with 16 players for the week then?

Absolutely

Johnny B Goode wrote:

Better to just run with 16 players for the week then?

100% mate

Mistake not giving Woakes his ten overs

Still blaming Carey

Krump wrote:Mistake not giving Woakes his ten overs

Dont know how fit he is but I think he would be much more effective bowling 8 upfront

Huge innings from Smith

Krump wrote:Huge innings from Smith

Captains Ex Captains Knock that

Fine I'll run with 16 players for the week and conserve two trades for the run home.

Not going to enjoy seeing my ranking take a tumble though. Those trades had better help.

Johnny B Goode wrote:Fine I'll run with 16 players for the week and conserve two trades for the run home.  

Not going to enjoy seeing my ranking take a tumble though. Those trades had better help.

You won’t be the only one mate. You get a skewed view here because all the people with no trades or 15 playing have stopped posting

Johnny B Goode wrote:Fine I'll run with 16 players for the week and conserve two trades for the run home.  

Not going to enjoy seeing my ranking take a tumble though. Those trades had better help.

I think a few guys are running with coates as a starter due to Teddy and Ponga out. He got 16 with a try so its pretty muuch running with 16.

Did I hear he was training at centre?

Krump wrote:
You won’t be the only one mate. You get a skewed view here because all the people with no trades or 15 playing have stopped posting

25 runs too little i think! Too much in this England batting lineup

Welshy wrote:

25 runs too little i think! Too much in this England batting lineup

25 runs too little if they were playing anyone else

WT Winfield wrote:

25 runs too little if they were playing anyone else

Seriously hope they do it mate, can't see it though

Starc will need a 5 for

WT Winfield wrote:

25 runs too little if they were playing anyone else

Damn straight

StormTrooper96 wrote:With L.Martin being ruled out should I try find another way to get Arey and a decent 17th man with 1 trade for the run home, or just go Fainu and then Arey and then Fainu to Gun 17th man but no trades

Similar to the current sentiment, all things being equal saving that 1 trade for at least a few more Rounds could get you a shitload more points in the long run then using it now. Unless you have cover in all positions, you could end up paying 16 every week if you can't trade a potential long term injury out.

Anyone getting Yeo in? Tempting but surely he's one concussion away from being out the rest of the season.

Warner fell 1 run short of taking out top run scorer and in the meantime cost me 400 bucks. kent.

Krump wrote:
You won’t be the only one mate. You get a skewed view here because all the people with no trades or 15 playing have stopped posting

True true. Just hope I don't find myself at the end of the season with 1 trade remaining in a stunning turn of events where I get few injuries.

I didn't play last year but the year before that I held onto just 1 trade for a bit before I used it to get an underwhelming Sam Burgess out for Paul Vaughan. I didn't even use it for an injury lol but it was 100% the right move. I can recall Vaughan outscoring Surgess by a fair bit in the run home although by season's end I got Lewis Brown's AE twice.

Speaking of which why do some players like Vaughan just have one form year where they're a fantasy gun and then just go back to sub 50 averages. Jesse Bromwich used to be a genuine gun too.

B/L wrote:Warner fell 1 run short of taking out top run scorer and in the meantime cost me 400 bucks. kent.

Don't feel too bad, after Kane scores 101 in the final it wouldn't have mattered

Well that wasnt even close in the end.

England hitting form at a worrying time.

As a dual citizen of the two great countries I will celebrate either way